Subject: Legal-submission request seeking removal of WIJDR's article about Justice Perry-Bond.
Your legal submission has been reviewed. On the information supplied, it does not establish that the federal Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act covers the judge in question, identify with sufficient specificity the allegedly protected information in the article, or establish a legal basis for removal of the entire publication.
WIJDR rejects the request for wholesale removal as submitted. This is not a rejection of genuine judicial-security protections. New York Judiciary Law § 859 separately provides protections for qualifying judges, subject to its scope, procedures, and exceptions—including public-interest reporting and commentary. Any properly supported claim under applicable law will be evaluated on its particular facts.
WIJDR requests a substantive written response within 72 hours after this notice is published. This is an editorial resolution period, not a statutory deadline imposed on the recipient. Failure to respond, withdraw, or apologize does not itself establish liability.
WIJDR reserves the right to consider any available legal remedies if reliable evidence establishes actionable unlawful interference, materially false assertions causing legally cognizable harm, or another violation of applicable law. We do not assert that any such claim is already proven by receipt of this submission, and no litigation is represented as already filed or inevitable.
We request preservation of the original submission, related correspondence, and records of claimed authorization for purposes of verifying authenticity and assessing the demand accurately.
WIJDR will continue publishing lawful reporting, public records, and criticism of public officials while considering concrete, legally supported concerns regarding protected personal information. A citation to a statute and a removal deadline do not, standing alone, justify erasing an entire article.
Disposition: Blanket removal demand rejected as submitted.
We await an authenticated, legally particularized response—not another unexplained request to erase public-interest journalism.
The Editorial Administration
LucyCraig.blog
Supporting documents: Legal-submission exhibit · DeleteMe homepage exhibit · N.Y. Judiciary Law § 859 · Federal Daniel Anderl Act.
Verification: The request's claimed source and authorization have not been independently established. This notice asserts no finding of impersonation, fraud, bad faith, or misconduct by a named individual.