Omissions comparison
#	Subject	November 2024 police statement	September 2026 civil complaint	Assessment
20	Stolen wallet and earlier police involvement	Describes a theft at Crunch Fitness earlier on October 19, including her wallet, payment cards, and belongings, followed by a report to Ithaca Police. Police p. 1.	The chronology begins with the sorority event and drinking. ¶¶135–136.	The complaint omits a major preceding event and its consequences for her evening.
21	Reason for drinking heavily	Explains she began drinking to catch up with sorority sisters after discovering she had been replaced as a sober monitor. Police p. 1.	Describes drinking Tito's vodka until intoxicated, without the explanation for her drinking decisions. ¶136.	Important omitted context relevant to the sequence of events.
22	Her original sober-monitor assignment	Says she was supposed to be a sober monitor but was replaced because other members thought she might not return in time. Police p. 1.	Describes the sorority's sober-monitor system generally, without identifying her former assignment. ¶140.	Potentially relevant to allegations about sorority supervision and procedures.
23	Preexisting medical condition and food intake	Describes postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), dizziness, and very limited food intake that day. Police p. 1.	Attributes her intoxication and incapacity principally to alcohol and subsequent drugs. ¶¶144, 149, 172.	Omitted medical context that could matter when evaluating impairment and symptoms. It does not negate intoxication.
24	How the Moonies drink was obtained	Explains that she solicited a credit card from another person, discussed her underage hand marking, and obtained the cocktail through the bartender. Police pp. 1–2.	Alleges Moonies served her while she was marked as under 21. ¶¶139, 586–588.	The complaint omits details of the purchase. These could matter to the Dram Shop claim without necessarily removing the bar's responsibility.
25	Prior relationship with a participant	Says she already knew one man in the upstairs room and had previously been intimate with him approximately a year earlier. Police p. 3.	Describes the upstairs encounter without that history. ¶¶150–156.	Potentially relevant background omitted from the pleading. Redaction prevents confirming the man's identity from this copy alone.
26	Refusal of a foursome and anal sex	Explicitly describes rejecting a proposed foursome because of the expected sexual activity. Police p. 4.	Does not separately describe that refusal in the corresponding narrative. ¶¶158–165.	Omitted evidence of an expressly communicated sexual boundary.
27	The Snapchat communication	Describes learning afterward that fraternity members were boasting about what happened. Police p. 6.	Includes a purported Snapchat communication at approximately 1:42 a.m. and alleges it encouraged other members to join. ¶¶162–163 and the exhibit on PDF p. 28.	A substantial addition of purported contemporaneous evidence, rather than a contradiction in her recollection.
28	Activity after waking at 10 a.m.	Describes awakening to a man hovering over her who said he intended to put his penis in her mouth. She reports responding negatively and that he moved away. Police p. 6.	Describes her awakening and returning home without this incident. ¶175.	An additional alleged sexual advance omitted from the later chronology.
29	Transportation home	States a man drove her back to her sorority house on Sunday morning. Police p. 6.	States that she awoke and returned to the sorority house. ¶175.	The complaint omits how she got home, but the descriptions are compatible.
30	Date of reporting the incident	The voluntary statement bears a November 2024 interview date and November 15 sworn date. Police p. 1.	Says she reported the incident to Cornell Police on or about November 8, 2024. ¶179.	Apparent date difference only. A November 8 initial report could precede a November 14–15 formal statement. More records are needed to determine the reporting sequence.