Public discussion • Comment #3597

Community contribution

2026-10-15T17:11:20+00:00

It is not even protected at the moment. There is no decision of the court allowing her to proceed as "Jane Doe". Any decision would apply only to parties, and limited non-parties (such as individuals protected under Title IX) but in no event could an order in this case affect a non-party publication such as this blog. Her name, like the name of any party in any judicial matter, is public information.

View within the discussion →

Reader comments are their authors' views and do not represent verified findings or editorial conclusions.