Titel IX Beschluss des Anhörungsgremiums (Redacted in der Art. 78 Verfahren in Ithaca, New York)Medienmetadaten›
Wählen Sie OCR und Transkript laden, wenn verfügbar.
Quellendisziplin:Dieser Artikel kann Behauptungen, umstrittene Behauptungen, Zitate und redaktionelle Analysen enthalten. Folgen Sie den verlinkten Beweisseiten und zitierten Quellen, um den Kontext zu untersuchen, bevor Sie Schlussfolgerungen ziehen.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
Comments & replies
No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.
@janedoe1 edited
NEW ARTICLE:
What Cornell’s Own Title IX Record Reveals About the Cornell Seven | Beyond the Allegations
"Some of the most legally significant passages in the earlier police statement concern boundaries and responses. The complainant described stopping the initial sexual activity when one participant became unwell. She also described explicitly rejecting a proposed expansion of another sexual encounter. Later, she recalled telling two participants she was tired and needed to stop, and that they stopped. She described a separate unwanted sexual advance the next morning that ended after she refused it. Those details deserve consideration because they bear on individual interactions, what was communicated, and how particular people reacted. [Police statement, pp. 3–4, 6]"
Suche nach WIJDR
Suchen Sie, während Sie Ihren aktuellen Seiten- und Kommentarentwurf offen halten.
Comments & replies
No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.