Facebook lo ha nombrado la Policía de Moralidad de Internet

¿No es adorable?

Hoy cometí el acto aparentemente indignante de buscar Facebook para "Lucy Craig".

¿La respuesta de Facebook? "Resultados positivos ocultos."

¡Gracias a Dios! Imagina la devastación psicológica que podría haber sufrido por ver la misma información que busqué deliberadamente! Pensándolo bien, podrían haberme salvado de ver imágenes adicionales de ella.

Aparentemente, Facebook ha decidido que no se puede confiar en adultos adultos para leer las cosas, evaluar la información o, entretenerse, formar sus propias malditas opiniones.

En cambio, tenemos una pantalla de censura encantadora y un pequeño botón útil que nos dirige al Centro de Ayuda de Facebook, que no proporciona ninguna ayuda. ¡Qué considerado!

Tal vez el Centro de Ayuda puede explicar por qué una corporación consigue jugar a la momia digital y decidir lo que sus usuarios son lo suficientemente maduros para ver. No puedo buscar "Lucy Craig" (un tema de debate público masivo) pero sus propias plataformas permiten a los menores de 13 años observar pornografía. Tiene sentido.

¿Qué hace esta búsqueda tan sensible? Facebook no dice. Aparentemente, las explicaciones también son sensibles.

Esta es una idea revolucionaria, Facebook: Si busco algo, y manualmente lo escribo en la barra de búsqueda, tal vez quiera cogerlo.

No pedí niñera. Pedí resultados de búsqueda.

Pero gracias, Silicon Valley, por proteger a la humanidad de los peligros aterradores del pensamiento independiente y la verificación y la investigación.

A este ritmo, la siguiente característica de Facebook será pedir su permiso para tener una opinión - y luego negarlo por su propia seguridad.

Bienvenido a 2026, donde buscar un nombre requiere aprobación moral corporativa.

Pero no aquí en el LucyCraig.blog donde promovemos la libertad de expresión al máximo.

Disciplina fuente:Este artículo puede contener alegaciones, reclamaciones en disputa, citas y análisis editorial. Siga las páginas de evidencia vinculadas y citó fuentes para inspeccionar el contexto antes de sacar conclusiones.

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Anonymous2026-10-15 06:06 UTC

Her Instagram is also not appearing in search results despite having 10x the followers of the account that does appear at the top when you search for Lucy Craig, which means it’s been purposely delisted.

Anonymous2026-10-15 00:34 UTC

Most of the internet is controlled out of san fran. The degenerate center of the universe and yes they have an agenda and use their platforms to try and influence and control people.

Anonymous2026-10-14 16:42 UTC

Is anyone shocked that the shit stain globalist, who described fellow classmates who first used Fuckbook as "dumb fucks", would have workers doing their meta thing?

Maggot scum like him are not human in the strictest sense. Biologically maybe, but he's just another of life's pieces of shit that unfortunately much like Lucy Craig, macks mockery of the civility that most of us want the world to be conducted in.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-14 17:37 UTC

I think you know what you have to do...

Anonymous2026-10-14 14:09 UTC

I've seen a ton of workarounds on FB and TikTok: LucyCra1g, LucyCra!g, LucyCr@ig, etc...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-14 14:43 UTC

I've found that the lynchmob bitches go APE if you use the name LUCY or MsCraig in the comments lol

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-14 15:20 UTC

Best reason to keep doing it

Anonymous2026-10-14 01:50 UTC

Meanwhile--hilariously--every insipid "I Am Jane Doe" post (on FB, TT, and Insta) is filled with "Lucy Craig" comments :D

They try to pull the comments naming her, but it's a hopeless game of whack-a-mole: one comes down, 50 more go up...

When will these morons realize that censorship never works?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-15 00:38 UTC

Actually it does work. That's why they do it. There are many things our ancestors or even people 20 years ago would see as aberrant but are now acceptable or even celebrated. This was done through HEAVY censorship and propaganda.

Anonymous2026-10-14 01:15 UTC

When you search any of the names of the boys, they are fully doxxed...

Anonymous2026-10-14 00:59 UTC

Ridiculous. But the crazy thing is how her insta is still active and available. It’s probably flooded with DMs telling her she’s a slut, all which would be warranted. She’s still putting herself out there, so why the search restriction, right?

I’m no misogynist or woman hater (far from it), but this bitch is nasty!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-14 12:06 UTC

Lucy is hot, her insta looks very cute and sweet, like someone you would want to datee (don't watch the clips though, she's obviously full of herself and a bit thick), but snorting k of cocks and being spitroasted by a total of 4 guys is pretty fucking nasty. I used to think past doesn't matter, now I think that's true within limits.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-14 16:37 UTC

Her boyfriend (there's a whole lot to unpack on that topic) is a photographer. So he can constantly photograph her.

Full of herself, doesn't begin to explain this cunttard.

The whole keeps a cucked boyfriend to maintain appearances is a thing too. To hide the fact that they

are pigs. He dodged a bullet on that one.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-14 12:02 UTC

If you search for Lucy Craig, it pops up immediately, if you look for Lucy Craig under new on Bing, you get zero results. I really don't think a search engine should censor its results.

@janedoe12026-10-13 22:59 UTC

Tiktok also restricts Lucy Craig.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-13 23:36 UTC

This phrase may be associated with behavioir or content that violates our guidelines... Sounds like they are judging her!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-13 23:46 UTC

Facebook slutshames Jane Doe!

@janedoe12026-10-13 22:57 UTC

Instagram also restricts "Lucy Craig".

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-14 10:57 UTC

Becareful, you saw what happened when Chi Phi restricted her!

Anonymous2026-10-13 22:51 UTC

Zuckerbirg is really not all there, i think he made billions from a simple idea (compared to apple, tesla, etc) , but otherwise is not much of a visionary or human being.