Titre IX Décision du groupe d'audience (Rédaction déposée dans le cadre de la procédure prévue à l'article 78 à Ithaca, New York)Métadonnées des médias›
Sélectionnez pour charger OCR et transcription, lorsque disponible.
Source discipline:Cet article peut contenir des allégations, des revendications contestées, des citations et une analyse éditoriale. Suivez les pages de preuves liées et les sources citées pour inspecter le contexte avant de tirer des conclusions.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
Comments & replies
No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.
@janedoe1 edited
NEW ARTICLE:
What Cornell’s Own Title IX Record Reveals About the Cornell Seven | Beyond the Allegations
"Some of the most legally significant passages in the earlier police statement concern boundaries and responses. The complainant described stopping the initial sexual activity when one participant became unwell. She also described explicitly rejecting a proposed expansion of another sexual encounter. Later, she recalled telling two participants she was tired and needed to stop, and that they stopped. She described a separate unwanted sexual advance the next morning that ended after she refused it. Those details deserve consideration because they bear on individual interactions, what was communicated, and how particular people reacted. [Police statement, pp. 3–4, 6]"
Recherche WIJDR
Recherchez tout en gardant votre page actuelle et commentez le projet ouvert.
Comments & replies
No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.