# WIJDR_Response_to_DeleteMe_Legal_Submission Source: https://lucycraig.blog/media/598 File: WIJDR_Response_to_DeleteMe_Legal_Submission.pdf Format: application/pdf Description: WIJDR_Response_to_DeleteMe_Legal_Submission.pdf Alt text: WIJDR_Response_to_DeleteMe_Legal_Submission.pdf ## OCR / extracted text --- Page 1 --- LUCYCRAIG.BLOG • FORMAL CORRESPONDENCE Page 1 LUCYCRAIG.BLOG | EDITORIAL ADMINISTRATION FORMAL RESPONSE TO LEGAL REMOVAL REQUEST Date: October 22, 2026 To: DeleteMe Support From: Editorial Administration, LucyCraig.blog Re: Purported request on behalf of Justice Phaedra F. Perry-Bond — rejection, withdrawal request, and reservation of rights To DeleteMe Support: We write in response to the October 22, 2026 communication submitted through LucyCraig.blog’s legal-submission portal, purportedly on behalf of New York Supreme Court Justice Phaedra F. Perry-Bond. The communication seeks immediate removal of our article and invokes the federal Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act. This is a response to a legal/privacy request, not a copyright or DMCA notice. The demand for wholesale removal is rejected as submitted. It does not identify each allegedly protected passage, photograph, or data element; adequately establish the requested relief under the federal law cited; or explain why removal of an entire article about a public judicial officer would be required notwithstanding protections for news reporting and commentary on matters of public concern. Legal grounds The federal Daniel Anderl Act addresses protected information of defined categories of federal judicial officers and certain family members. The submission does not establish that its federal statutory provisions cover this New York State justice. This does not mean state judicial privacy protections are inapplicable. New York Judiciary Law § 859 independently protects qualifying judges, subject to statutory requirements and exceptions, including for news reporting, commentary, and speech on public concerns. We will review any specifically identified, properly supported claim concerning genuinely protected personal information. Requested resolution within 72 hours We request a written response within 72 hours after receipt of this letter addressing the following: 1. Confirm withdrawal of the blanket demand that the entire WIJDR article be deleted. 2. Confirm the identity of the submitting entity and supply reasonable verification of its authorization to represent Justice Perry-Bond in this matter. 3. Identify the exact content alleged to be protected, the statute and provision relied upon, the applicable notice requirements, and the legal basis for the specific remedy requested. 4. Correct or withdraw any inaccurate assertion about federal statutory coverage or available enforcement remedies. 5. If the judge personally authorized the blanket demand, convey our request for a direct, authenticated written acknowledgment and apology for the demand’s unsupported breadth. --- Page 2 --- LUCYCRAIG.BLOG • FORMAL CORRESPONDENCE Page 2 The 72-hour period is a requested opportunity to resolve this dispute, not a purported statutory deadline. Neither nonresponse nor refusal to apologize, standing alone, establishes legal liability. Reservation of rights We reserve all editorial and legal rights, including the right to seek advice and pursue any remedy supported by evidence of actionable unlawful conduct and resulting harm. We do not claim that this submission alone proves bad faith, frivolous litigation, or a presently viable cause of action. Please preserve the original request, authorization records, and related communications relevant to its preparation and transmission. An elected or appointed judicial officer’s public work, qualifications, rulings, professional record, and other lawfully reported matters of public concern remain proper subjects of scrutiny. Legitimate judicial security concerns deserve consideration; a generalized demand to erase public-interest commentary does not. Sincerely, Editorial Administration LucyCraig.blog Reference article: https://lucycraig.blog/article/judge-phaedra-f-perry-bond Submitted request: https://lucycraig.blog/media/590 | Company screenshot: https://lucycraig.blog/media/589 Authorities: https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/JUD/859 | https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/part-III Verification note: The identity and claimed authorization of the original sender have not been independently authenticated. ## Transcript ## Machine-readable JSON https://lucycraig.blog/media/598/index.json