PDF · PUBLIC LIBRARY #606
911974_26_Gillio_Lopes_v_Kathleen_M_Hochul_et_al_LETTER___CORRESPOND_22
File: 911974_26_Gillio_Lopes_v_Kathleen_M_Hochul_et_al_LETTER___CORRESPOND_22.pdf · 0.19 MB
SHA-256:
OCR: ready · Transcript: not_applicable
SHA-256:
8b94ac5e4c7a…4111135452 OCR: ready · Transcript: not_applicable
OCR / extracted text
--- Page 1 ---
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
___________________________
nmllplaw.com
Ira S. Nesenoff
Andrew T. Miltenberg
Stuart Bernstein
______________________________
Tara J. Davis
Gabrielle M. Vinci
Kara L. Gorycki
Barbara H. Trapasso
Kristen E. Mohr
Helen J. Setton
Kirsten E. Roy
Brittany E. Bard
Lauren G. Hutchison
Adrienne D. Levy
Regina M. Federico
Kimberly S. Courtney
Senior Litigation Counsel
Marybeth Sydor
Title IX Consultant
363 Seventh Avenue | 5th Floor | New York, NY | 10001 | T: 212.736.4500
101 Federal Street | 19th Floor | Boston, MA | 02110 | T: 617.209.2188
October 23, 2026
VIA NYSCEF and e-mail
Honorable James R. Farrell
Acting Supreme Court Justice
Supreme Court of the State of New York
Sullivan Supreme and County Courthouse
414 Broadway
Monticello, New York 12701
Re:
Lopes, Gillio v. Hochul, et al.
Supreme Court, Albany County | Index No. 911974-26
Dear Justice Farrell:
This firm represents Petitioner in the above-referenced matter. I write today to respectfully
request permission to file a reply memorandum of law in further support of the verified petition
and in reply to Respondents’ answer and opposition of up to 6,500 words.
Pursuant to 22 NYCRR § 202.8-b and this Court’s rules, a reply memorandum of law is
limited to 4,200 words.
By letter dated October 20, 2026 (NYSCEF Doc. No. 16), Respondents requested
permission to file a memorandum of law in opposition to the verified petition and in support of
their answer of up to 12,000 words, so that they may assert both their objections in point of law
and their opposition to the merits of Petitioner’s application in a single submission. To adequately
address both Respondents’ objections in point of law, as well as their arguments on the merits of
Petitioner’s application, Petitioner requires additional words
Accordingly, Petitioner respectfully requests permission to file a reply memorandum of
law in further support of the verified petition of up to 6,500 words.
INDEX NO. 911974-26
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2026
1 of 2
--- Page 2 ---
October 23, 2026
Page 2 of 2
363 Seventh Avenue | 5th Floor | New York, NY | 10001 | T: 212.736.4500
101 Federal Street | 19th Floor | Boston, MA | 02110 | T: 617.209.2188
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Respectfully submitted,
NESENOFF & MILTENBERG, LLP
By: /s/ Andrew T. Miltenberg
Andrew T. Miltenberg, Esq.
Stuart Bernstein, Esq.
Tara J. Davis, Esq.
cc: All counsel of record via NYSCEF
INDEX NO. 911974-26
NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22
RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2026
2 of 2
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
Comments & replies
No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.
No comments yet. You can be the first without creating an account.