Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified logo Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified
Public record • Accessible • Indexed

The site
at a glance.

Explore published articles, public conversations, media, OCR, transcripts and preserved court records. Search-engine and AI indexes update automatically as public material is published.

SEARCH + AI INDEXESXML sitemap indexJSONPlain textCSVJSON LinesMedia + metadataAI indexllms.txtFull AI guideRSSAll updates RSSAll updates AtomArticles RSSMedia RSSDiscussions RSSComments RSSDockets RSSGoogle News XML

Public pages 4043 entries • Page 37 of 54

comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3118

100% Anthony Albononsense from Australia has joined the mud sliding rainbow liberal train in support if Lindsay Clancy and Lucy Craig. Initials both LC.. you can't make this up

/comment/3118
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3119

Why would it matter? Reaching orgasm when raped is common, it does not mean that it was consensual or that the victim wanted or enjoyed it.

/comment/3119
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3120

Clearly not, else she wouldn't have said it was rape.

/comment/3120
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3121

Thank you. I don't know if "anonymous" is an username now or not, but I have implemented a small change that will display the word "edited" after the date and time stamp if a comment is edited moving forward.

/comment/3121
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3122

Nope, we're actually the only ones coming with coherent takes and valid evidence. You people can only come with some bullshit like "some of the men were too drunk to consent, that means the victim raped her perpetrators". Like nobody w

/comment/3122
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3123

By calling her “Big” Tish James, The admins and creators of this site Expose their bias.

/comment/3123
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3124

By the site calling Doe’s attorney A “lolwyer” This site exposes Its creators bias. They say it’s about free-speech, But that lie is just a cover.

/comment/3124
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3125

Nah, You have an opinion. Thats why you started this site. Otherwise you would attach a nickname to the frat bros, like you have lolwyer and Big James……. But of course, you haven’t. You’re just as lowly as the lawyer.

/comment/3125
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3126

The "evidence" that supposedly shows her texting her friends while it happened are bogus. Just read the time stamps of the messages, 6pm, 9pm that was hours before the alleged assault took place. Maybe, just maybe, could you make the a

/comment/3126
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3127

What should be a serious discussion about consent, right to privacy, biased narratives, public rush to judgement, slut shaming, and college / Greek culture…….. Falls into the abyss of right wing misogynists, and left wing man haters.

/comment/3127
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3128

What should be a serious discussion about consent, right to privacy, biased narratives, public rush to judgement, slut shaming, and college / Greek culture…….. Falls into the abyss of right wing misogynists, and left wing man haters.

/comment/3128
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3129

I'm sorry if I came off as rude there, I get that remaining civil is best to get ones point across, but I just think it's so disgusting to do this to a potential rape victim. Like even devils like Putin and Netanyahu wouldn't have the

/comment/3129
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3130

She replied to a text from her sorry sister at 3:05 am.

/comment/3130
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3131

If being drunk means you can’t give consent to sex, Then 2/3rds of college undergrads are rapists, Regardless of their gender.

/comment/3131
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3132

What does that prove though? That a heavily intoxicated and drugged woman texted her sister, that's all that it proves. We have all been very drunk at least once in our life, and you know damn well that when we're that intoxicated we d

/comment/3132
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3133

You're only allowed to show men are evil oppressors and women are innocent victims. Delete this.

/comment/3133
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3134

When you headucate a woman, you headucate a village, as the feminist saying goes. What's the cross over of Train Hoe and Lyndsey Clancey supporters?

/comment/3134
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3135

If anything tat says more about how fucked up our society is than it says about this case. That she was drunk isn't even the big problem here, the biggest problem is what the 7 did. It wasn't just another casual sexual encounter, it wa

/comment/3135
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3136

Nobody is saying this. You're arguing against a straw-man opponent that you made up in your own mind. We're simply arguing that she was taken advantage of based on the evidence that we have seen. Just calling us feminists or misandrist

/comment/3136
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3138

Read her report to Cornell, posted on this site. She clearly states she told these "bros" she didn't want to do some things, and they complied. She never asked to leave and never asked for help (even in her 3:05am text). Some frat bros

/comment/3138
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3140

If you want to support the victim in this case, you can go to cornellseven.com, or directly to change.org, and become one of the currently 69,014 verified signatories in supporting the Cornell vicimg Jane Doe. The petition is titled "C

/comment/3140
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3141

Read her report to Cornell, posted on this site. She clearly states she told these "bros" she didn't want to do some things, and they complied. She never asked to leave and never asked for help (even in her 3:05am text). Some frat bros

/comment/3141
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3142

The site owner is deleting comments mentioning legitimate websites and petitions supporting the victim. In other words he's silencing and censoring Jane Doe supporters, this does not align with the blog owners own expressed goal of a s

/comment/3142
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3143

She enjoyed a gang bang night, hard to say she is a victim. But she is indeed a victim of being judged as a slut by sorority sis.

/comment/3143
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3144

Moderator, How do you decide what comments to keep vs which ons you delete? Because you are clearly deleting comments / replies.

/comment/3144
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3145

I am deleting your comments that call for cancel culture. Also, if you want to spam some other website, do it on other platforms, this is not a self promotional comment section. Do that on social media, it ruins the experience for ever

/comment/3145
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3147

WDYM taking advantage of her. She sucked so many dicks, did ketamine of others’ dick, banged so many times, and importantly, every time when she says no the boys stopped, such as foursome, anal… She was clearly enjoying

/comment/3147
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3149

It’s criminal to use her name. You are in contempt of court as you are putting her life in danger. You will be reported to the judge.

/comment/3149
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3150

that would be surprising, because there is a shit-ton of stuff on here supporting her, mocking the operators, etc... maybe you feel in to a k-hole and hallucinated the whole thing?

/comment/3150
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3152

Yes, the only speech should be illegal is the speech that tries to eliminate others’ speech.

/comment/3152
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3155

You should only have free speech when you don’t try to cancel others’ free speech.

/comment/3155
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3156

The petition that I am referring to below does NOT call for the cancellation of anything or anyone, it's strictly a petition to support the potential victim of rape. Change.org: become one of the over 68000 people to sign a petition su

/comment/3156
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3157

Ok, so by your logic the site owner should not have free speech, because he's cancelling ours? We dont even call for cancellations or anything, we're here engaging with you guys and your perspective, aren't we?

/comment/3157
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3158

Good morning, everyone. Overnight, a whackadoodle decided to flood our comment section with repeated demands to “report” this site, while simultaneously promoting their own website, which appears to offer a decidedly one-sided version

/comment/3158
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3160

Would you like me to post your comments, in full? You literally posted calls to report this site to various alleged providers for the purposes of canceling the site.

/comment/3160
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3161

The comments like the ones calling to report the site will remain hidden. We did find that one of the comments that was mixed with the calls for cancel culture did not include calls for cancel culture, so it has been restored. Given th

/comment/3161
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3166

Yeah read the comments of that petition. They either obviously did not at all read the documents independently; or they themselves are accusing others for raping, so the more likely explanation is that they know what’s happening, but t

/comment/3166
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3167

Cornellseven illustrates everything that is wrong in with this story. It publicly sentences 7 (barely) men to a lifetime of ridicule and shame, without a trial, or a conviction. By presenting only one side of the story, and without an

/comment/3167
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3168

We have restored your appropriate comment. Your MANY other comments commingling calls to cancel us, with third party site promotions will remain hidden for the reasons stated below. And stop fucking spamming. It ruins the experience. P

/comment/3168
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3169

God does not give us free speech. The 3rd commandment is pure censorship: Thou shall not use the Lords' name in vain.

/comment/3169
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3170

Also u are falsely identifying someone and putting this girls life in danger - also criminal

/comment/3170
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3172

I'm glad you created this. No one seems to understand that this is a / a civil case not a criminal case. Essentially a money grab. Hey,I'm off work that's why we have civil courts. I used it once myself. However, I don't think that you

/comment/3172
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3174

All that priviledge, oppurtunity and money. Given how economies function, it's all at the cost of others. You can imagine what her parents have done to get there in the sense of what they did to others. The money alone they would have

/comment/3174
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3175

Let's see if the matriarchal misandrist court system + media apparatus lets Train Doe get away with ruining 7 men's lives for degenerate but consensual sex. Imagine enthusiastically wanting to get dogged down by multiple guys at once a

/comment/3175
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3176

The confrontation clause must be honored, even if ZOG doesn't want it.

/comment/3176
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3177

There is not even an order permitting her to proceed as "Jane Doe" that restricts any participant from releasing or saying her name, let alone an order that can touch on a non-party, non-jurisdictional individual who has not had any op

/comment/3177
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3178

All sexual assault allegations should be regarded as false by default. That's actually what presumed innocence looks like. And you have to take that position even before taking a hard look at her contradictions and changing stories.

/comment/3178
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3179

Didn't she blow a guy while he was passed out?

/comment/3179
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3180

If Lucy Craig had as many pricks sticking out of her as she's had stuck in her, she'd be a porcupine

/comment/3180
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3181

I don't think she's even owed an apology. She made her choice. She put herself in a really bad situation. One poor choice after another after another after another and I think it fears really some examination of, why is it that women c

/comment/3181
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3184

Cry harder. Lucy Craig is a firecrotch trainskank

/comment/3184
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3185

Lucy Craig tarnished herself with her whoring around

/comment/3185
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3186

How is it vile? What do you disagree with?

/comment/3186
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3187

Confused. According to her police report she refused a foursome because she dislike anal, but now she wants 4? Did she anal after all

/comment/3187
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3188

"humanity shouldn't be trusted with a keyboard" Did (femi)Nazi see that cumming. Unlike Train Hoe who saw a lot of cumming. Except for accountability of which most these whores don't see. How someone can write disgusting shit like that

/comment/3188
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3189

Probably trying to recruit the slut to their pedo worshipping ranks.

/comment/3189
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3190

What is the connection between her supporters and Lyndsey Clancy supporters?

/comment/3190
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3192

She was pissed off that some bros she didnt know well came to the room... You will see in her statements she felt embarressed by so many strangers seeing her poon. You will see from her subsequent texts, she was worried rumours would s

/comment/3192
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3193

You whackadoodle. Dont gang spam our forum

/comment/3193
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3194

Jane Doe was a trained sober monitor too, but somehow didnt realise drug fuelled fuck fests could be risky. I wondee if she and males 1 and 2 (ingalls and newell) colluded to sue cornell?

/comment/3194
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3195

So unethical to spread the gang bang. What happens in Cornell, stays in Cornell.

/comment/3195
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3196

Ultimately, the argument of people calling for the arrest and conviction of the cornell seven is that men need to be responsible to interpret and decide what women want, as womens' statements cannot trusted in the moment. So much for w

/comment/3196
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3197

She revoked consent for the 3rd bang 3 weeks later, and all three 2 years later. In her civil claim she still says all seven guys sexually assaulted AND raped her then gives details of the same 4 guys ploughing her that she mentioned i

/comment/3197
comments • 2026-10-13

Public comment #3198

Can whore apply retrospectively now that she is after millions?

/comment/3198