谁是
简·多伊
真的吗?

"NowThis Impact" has over 2m followers on X. They hold themselves out to be a "news" corporation, but are really just a far-left radical antagonist.

 

In the first sentence of their recent post about the dismissal motions in the Lucy Craig matter, they get details incorrect. As simple of a matter as the court venue location. The lawsuit is venued in New York City, not Ithaca.

 

 

An account that gets the little details incorrect cannot be trusted with the big, complex, or much more important details, yet these are the accounts that will propagate the single sided narrative and demand for others to be suspended for "misinformation".

 

(*) While there is a pending motion by Moonies Bar to change venue, there is no decision on that motion as yet. The motion is fully plead and pending decision -but given this judge's proclivities for favoring the Plaintiff Lucy Craig it is unknown what the decision will be. Those documents, along with every docket filing, are available in the Library on this site. The decision will become immediately appealable as soon as it is issued (courts cannot excerise jurisdiction when they do not have it, so any jurisdiction issue must be resolved before the merits -thus the judge wants to try to quickly force the dismissal motions while holding on to a technical decision that could reverse and remove the case from her to an entirely new venue (in Ithaca) later. She is famefagging for as long as she can, because jurisidiction is almost certainly incorrect -the sole basis for jurisdiction are 2 points: 1) at the time the lawsuit was filed Lucy lived in New York City -standing alone this is not acceptable, and 2) Cornell has a satellite location in New York City - also flimsy grounds for jurisdiction against all defendants with a slightly better chance against Cornell, but even flimsy against Cornell since the allegations accused took place in Ithaca. Regardless, for the time being, the dismissal orders as presented by NowThis Impact are being heard in New York City, not Ithaca.

 

https://x.com/nowthisimpact/status/2121068046957654023

Should we create a new blog dedicated to viral cancel culture stories like the 3 girls at Ol' Miss who aped the flunking black girl?

 

Turns out there is far more to that story than the media is reporting.

Here is some irony:

 

The retards at Cornell Sun, who conspired with Lucy Criag and her lolwyer to dox the frat boys but not Lucy Craig, once employed Esat Braveboy (what a fucking name eh?) as a writer.

 

Who is Esat Braveboy? Well, he was sued in 2023 for drugging and raping women at Cornell. Did Cornell Sun dox him? Nope! They quitely removed his bi-lines and profile and remained quite.

 

New York Post (no paywall):

https://nypost.com/2026/11/09/us-news/cornell-student-paper-blasted-out-names-of-alleged-frat-rapists-but-scrubbed-bylines-of-own-writer-accused-of-sex-assaults/

 

People magazine (no paywall):

https://people.com/cornell-accused-of-ignoring-reports-of-former-students-alleged-repeated-sex-assaults-12245865

 

We are going to follow up on this story, get more information, and publish all the records of all the employees of CornellSun in the coming days.

 

Unlike traditional legacy media, we are self hosted, reliant on no policy (except the voices in our heads), no service providers, no government rules, laws, or regulations (our technology is completely decentralized). So, we will be researching and following up after do a deep, deep, dive into the CornellSun.

Lucy Craig has blocked our intermediary on Instagram. 🤣 as if we don't have 500 instagram accounts to lurk with.

Of the “hundreds of studies” Thomas Giuffra claims to have read, how many specifically support his assertion that friendly, apparently enthusiastic communications following an alleged sexual assault are manifestations of denial? And which studies establish the denial–shame–acceptance sequence he has proposed?

 

We have assembled a team of counselors, rape specialists, law enforcement professionals, attorneys, a prosecutor, and two rape survivors to prepare a paper examining the literature on Rape Trauma Syndrome in light of the claims Giuffra made during his Fox News interview.

 

Several points are already clear. Giuffra has stated that he has reviewed hundreds of studies and that none contradict his position. This is false. Rape Trauma Syndrome is expressly addressed in the court rules. Under Rule 7.10, which draws from the New York Court of Appeals decision in People v. Taylor, 75 N.Y.2d 277 (1990), expert testimony on Rape Trauma Syndrome may be used only to explain certain post-event behaviors; it cannot be used to prove that a rape occurred.

 

There is a substantial body of research that contradicts Giuffra’s claims; we will address it in detail in the forthcoming paper. The quantitative evidence on “unacknowledged rape” (the category most relevant to his argument) is limited. In Littleton, Layh & Rudolph (2018), for example, only 104 women who met the researchers’ criteria for having been raped were studied. Of those, 17% were classified as being in denial or as unacknowledged victims. Among that 17%, the percentage who maintained friendly communications with the perpetrator was less than 1%. These cases are extreme outliers across the literature.

While terms such as DARVO have gained cultural visibility, their prevalence as a social or media trend does not equate to a dominant, biologically grounded, or statistically typical response to rape. The quantitative literature more consistently associates post-assault reactions with disgust, timely reporting or accusation, and the absence of ongoing friendly contact with the perpetrator.

 

Every ambulance chasing lolwyer will try to use DARVO denial excuses, but the reality is the percentage is so small that the tally of lawsuits filed using denial and DARVO excuses by lolwyer Thomas alone is so astronomically impossible based on the studies he himself likely quoted. Marginal, fractional, only a single digit or less, percentage of rape victims enter the denial stage immediately.

 

In the vast majority of the studies on the topic of rape trauma and behavior The majority recognized they were raped and this is attributed to: family stability, morals and ethics, financially sound (attorneys, medical, etc are a cost that prohibits many victims of rape from reporting)... in short if you are raised in a wealthy stable home you are more likely (indeed almost 98% likely) to recognize you have been raped and will act to report it immediately.

 

"Common knowledge" is almost always incorrect. Our experts are finalizing their findings for a future blog post.

 

 

We will publish the full report prepared by the assembled team as soon as it is complete.