THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

LATEST

Articles & analysis

PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Posting anonymously — no login required.
Optional: sign in or create a pseudonymous username to edit/delete your comments later.
Anonymous
I hope all you men get raped

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Thanks?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
by other men too

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous
again, thanks? you homophobic fugly
Anonymous
U guys are fucking disgusting weirdos, innocent until proven guilty but yalls wont even let the court proceedings HAPPEN before you jump to shit on a woman and dox her.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
" innocent until proven guilty" It's the men who are accused, also her testimony was already considered true, and they said no crimes were committed.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Revealing Lucy Craig's NAME isn't "doxing" -- read a dictionary bitch

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
"Doxing (or doxxing) is the intentional online exposure of an individual’s identity, private information or personal details without their consent with the intent of causing harm".
 
Looks like you bitches need to learn the simple act of googling. calling her names, coming to CONCLUSIONS abt whether it was a "gangbang", engaging in memes abt this- how is it not defamation and doxing dumb fuck

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous
the whore filed a LoLsuit, she became a public figure so stfu about this doxing bs

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
We are just discussing what best explains the situation like any mainstream media.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
you will be raped. kill all men.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous
If you say so..
Anonymous
Cornell7 needs to start identifying as trans and lawyer up on the white rich female on victimhood games with a reverse uno card.
 
Crazy only understand crazy.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
we don't give a fuck about men pretending to be women
Anonymous
All this over a Halloween party disinvite?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
I think that UTI was more than she expected as well

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
And then she waddled away. Wobble wobble.
Anonymous
AI identifies Lucy Craig as Jane Doe. LOL
 
But woke LLMs are all scrambling to hide the "victim"
 
https://scontent-sjc6-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/825268142_1413152154128235_4962403018821163255_n.jpg?stp=dst-webp_p280x280_q70&_nc_cat=109&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=d20ffe&_nc_ohc=UB8AgQp2-xoQ7kNvwE-MvFi&_nc_oc=AdoXYYZs7AUmzWESXYVI2dfoPFYP_1KzAxqVzAiSA_cwZ3hh5rA7JNgfJY1csHkNN9kn7wbys9JE7YkcbCwXSRzl&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-sjc6-1.xx&_nc_gid=ph2OZvJlnKsX2S78E3_F9w&_nc_ss=7b289&oh=00_AQNVA1PtufeCkSvRfD_noC-8pkPY_Lwa0S95zqrY2nSJLA&oe=6AD0234F
@janedoe1
Meet Lucy. The self hosted server that is powering this blog and making sure that no one is being censored.
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

@janedoe1
Lucy is getting gangbanged by internet traffic.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous
Make it red.
Anonymous
Lesson learned from this is to avoid most women. They crazy these days.
 
"If a man ghosts you, he is a rapist" - feminist
 
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1406927924366708/

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Classic false accuser mindsets
Anonymous
How did Lucy Lucille Craig's father, William Craig, fail her as a parent as to produce a gangbang loving whore?
 
Usually a problem of lack of attention.
 
His job as a glorified Physical Therapist shouldn't have taken so much time away from spending some quality time with his daughter. Or did he introduce her to such lifestyle choices?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
what the fuck is wrong with you fuckers- stop naming people's families, you're so fucking insane. rape is not a fucking joke you fucktards.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Her body her choice asf. She should have not felt ashamed of any of the gang bang.
 
Judgmental people like you pushed her to call it a rape. Should have been a happy gang bang night.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
No, libtards and pawn women voters are calling it that and pushing that narrative.
 
She wants to got laid and now wants to get paid. That's a whore.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous
That’s hard to justify. If she wants to get paid why not sue the boys immediately after the gang bang?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous
Because this is political. Dems trying to win NY. They are in trouble. They need a cause. I hope every man votes against them in November

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous
Only after cockblocker sister "mentor" told her about her options to cash in.
 
Look she didn't only sue the boys....she sued cornell, the frat, her own sorority, university leadership....desperate to cash in.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous
If all she wants is $$ why she quit cornell? In my view only fear of slut shaming justify this.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 6

Anonymous
"Why are they slut-shaming me?! All I did was act like a shameless slut!" --Lucy Craig
Anonymous
Society is now entering the White Women Fatigue phase. Getting tired of this shit.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Its american-hyper-polarisation fatigue, bro. The rest of the world thinks you are all fucked

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
Don't know about that.
 
UK sounds like USA preTrump era with the max wokeness and censorship.
 
Europe looks like they are following the Biden playbook of importing 3rd world to lower wages.
 
China you go to labor camps for mentioning Winnie the pooh.
 
Middle east...well between bombs and religious zealots it is hell on earth.
 
US is course correcting and truth is allowed to be leaked.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous
The world is doomed. Africa is the future.
Anonymous
What's more interesting than this attention whore is how Democrats will use her and jobless female voters as their midterm pawn. MSM will carry the message. Politicians will cry wolf again.
 
Will society learn the truth faster this time? Or will we have BLM 2.0 all over again?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
NYT disgusts me. Every single article is written with the presumption of guilt. Those little nobody reporters have too much power to steer the narrative.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
But when they take the comments off of the article, you know that they are afraid to admit that democrats got it wrong.
 
Articles are not the point. Comments to make you think what is acceptable by others is the point. Overtone window is the power they crave.
@janedoe1
We changed the comment section so that you can now reply to replies infinitely. You are no longer limited to replying to the original comment only.
 
Additionally, all media now has an expandable metadata section within the articles that will show the OCR or Transcripts, for vision impaired visitors with machine reading technology.
 
We also added our own petition page, completely seperated from the platform mainstream pages (like Change dot org) who moderate their platforms for morality or political purposes. You can read the first petition by visiting "Sign the Petition" in the menu of this page.
Anonymous
I wanna see what she looks like lol

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Okay
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1
here she is, for your viewing (not so) pleasure...
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

Anonymous
Showing off the hooters....what a surprise.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous
What hooters? I've seen overweight men with more...

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

Anonymous
AI prompt for this image: Redhead who likes to drink diarrhea
Anonymous
I appreciate this site because bing and google WILL NOT tell you about it despite the 1m views but they point you to thw identities of the accused. That is hypocrisy and censorship plain and simple, next they will hide commentary on prominent politicians, etc. Some already refused to engage on political topics during the presidential elections.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Google's AI search DOES acknowledge this site and provided a link ..
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1
Thank you. Yeah, Google Search Console initially allowed us to index the site, and then they restricted the domain. It still lingers, but doesn't reach the full potential because we are limited by the big tech babysitters who control most of the internet. Thankfully, we build a strong base infustructure that can compete fairly well. We are doing our best.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

Anonymous
@mention trump on X and blow this whole thing up? Dem globalists resorting back to censorship but admin has control over them with FCC.
Anonymous
I'm tired, boss. That's it, I'm going off-grid.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Amazing!
Anonymous
Men will have to start requiring women to sign a consent contract before they agree to have sex with them.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Just sue them first for raping you, John Doe.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Nope. Not enough. Extremists argue women can say no before you come, and if you fucked for extra 5-10sec that's a First Degree Rape.
Case: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1024&context=tma
 
You'd better shot a video showing her keep yelling "yes yes yes" to make it 100% safe.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
Or just let them in to the Halloween parties. Seriously.
Anonymous
this is the shit that happens when you legalize premarital sex. America is a barbaric society.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
This shit is what happens when fathers don't give daughters enough male attention. They become whores to get the wrong kind of attention.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
What would happen to them in Muslim world?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Premarital sex is barbaric? Hahaha, religious nutjobs are barbaric, countries run by royal families are barbaric. Humans had sex for 200,000 years before marriage ever existed. Marriage is societal control.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
Allowing premarital is better policy than allowing arranged marriage by 14.
Anonymous
??? If you take at face value the screenshots of the Snapchat thread shared on this site, then you must admit there was at least a conspiracy to use her for sex. They literally brag about it before the fact. Also, denial of a traumatic event is textbook ptsd?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Use a consenting unselective girl who does gang bangs for sex??? What a terrible crime

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
It was so traumatic that she bragged about it too and texted the 'rapist' "my body my choice....everyone else is jealous of me....it was not illegal...etc."

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
I wouldnt take these at face value, they look like AI slop. If a proper news outlet stated this, it would be different. Also, the key issue (the one constant through all the revisions) is that people she didnt know were in the room watching.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
The only explanation is she was enjoying the gang bang back then? If the boys only fucked her while she was conscious.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
ur a fucking retarded nigger and i hope you hang yourself

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
Eloquent!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
https://uhs.berkeley.edu/health-promotion/health-topics/coping-trauma https://pharmtox.utoronto.ca/sites/default/files/responding_empathically_to_survivors_of_trauma.pdf
Anonymous
You are such fucking losers. This girl is getting death threats. Why would you ever want to be on the side of alleged rapists?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Ummmm, because Lucy Craig is a lying firecrotch trainskank?
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Why are you so dumb? You can't read her own texts and form your own opinion?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
ur a fucking retarded nigger and i hope you hang yourself

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
I think she's lying and making false accusations so of course I would be on the side of the alleged.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
She was fine with it until word started to get around to her sorority.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
For justice? You think the boys deserve the accuses?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Lucy is the rapist
The 7 boys are innocent

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
Just call a whote a whore. She doing it for the $
Anonymous
Survivor my ass! It sounds like Jane Doe did exactly what she wanted to do that night then felt embarrassment and regret after rumors starting going around calling her a hoe. I think she should be prosecuted for false accusations and false reporting. Put her in prison for a while so she thinks twice before she tries to use men like this in the future. You don't get to consent to sex and drugs then change your mind ex post facto. I've seen many women use sex to trap men into relationships and when the men don't want a relationship, the women become vengeful and start making false accusations to intentionally hurt those men. Women think they are victims? What about the men who spend a majority of their lives in prison or have their lives ruined after false accusations? We've all seen cases where a man spends decades in prison only for the woman to come back at a later date to say she made it all up. What about the men who were trapped into relationships only to end up spending a majority of their lives paying alimony and child support to someone who never loved them in the first place? Those men are getting raped every day! What happens to the women who do these things? There is a double standard and everyone needs to stop blindly believing everything a woman says. Women aren't victims, just predators in their own way.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
No, SOME women are predators, some men are rapists, etc. Jane Doe engaged in filthy shameful behaviour and now wants to monetise that, these boys engaged in filty shameful behaviour, but filthy and shameful is not illegal

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Women aren't worth the effort or problems men end up dealing with because of them.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
Boys learn it the hard way too late. Their feminazi mother's didn't warn them.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Those seven guys would have been better off having a gay orgy with each other and leaving Jane Doe out of it. They could have kept it a secret instead of everything going public, they would have had more fun, they'd still be in school, and their futures would not have been ruined by the false accusations of a train hoe. Besides, they were already naked with each other having sex anyway. I imagine that was the real excitement of the night. Brothers watching and experiencing each other have sex. They might as well have taken that next step. They would be way better off right now.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
They already did all that during initiations to get into the frat.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Rape all the men

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
Too late - Lucy Craig already did

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Relax. Not all women are bad and all men are innocent. Focus on facts and evidences. Evidences just happen to support that Jane Doe is a 100% Train Whore, and she is likely making false accusations, that's it.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
I hope you get raped
Anonymous
Do you think 28% is too low or too high given the evidence. https://polymarket.com/event/any-of-the-cornell-7-charged-with-a-felony-sex-crime

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Money hungry whore sued her own sorority for not protecting her.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
From what? A crazy gang bang night as she put it, that she really enjoyed being with the guys?