THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

LATEST

Articles & analysis

PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Posting anonymously — no login required.
Optional: sign in or create a pseudonymous username to edit/delete your comments later.
Anonymous
Sister site: https://www.thecornell7.org

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
That shitty site doesn't mention Lucy Craig OR how she spread her legs like peanut butter OR how she texted afterwards that it was consensual. It's just more BS propaganda from the airhead feminist.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1
That idiot doesnt allow comments and directs everyone to his instagram account. Self serving.
This blog has no self promotion, no donation button, no identity of the admin(s), no censorship, no newsletter signup...
Speech is protected here, all sides, and everyone is welcome to opine on the topics.
That he has created a site is his choice, but he is just jumping on the bandwagon for instagram follows (the "Created by [his name] at the bottom of that page goes to his IG.)
@janedoe1
This guy could beat a room full of dudes to death, or at least get them off.
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous
Pretty sure they never forced her to stay in the room anyway lol 😂
Anonymous
the exact Text message words from herself when one of the Cornell 7 guys texted her the next day. I will just leave it at that......"aw jonathan i really appreciate this text. my memories super clouded too. i think we were all way to f[... ] drunk and high. i'm getting a little heat (pi phi girls ([... ] and [... ]) can't get my name out of their mouth)) but that's to be expected. but at the end of the day non of the sexual stuff was illegal and honestly i really liked being w u and matt. so anything anyone has to say about the gangbang is out of their jurisdiction. i don't think we should feel any shame for the part. our body our choice asf,"

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
"anything anyone has to say about the gamgbang is out of their jurisdiction."
"our body our choice asf."

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Y’all watch wayyyy too much porn that you think we out here dying to be Bonnie Blue. Unreal 🤣 I had no idea that men thought that women wanted to be gang banged so bad. But this event that took place sure brings it to surface! 🤡😳
 
Serious question: where does she say she wants a gang bang? Is that in texts somewhere? Everyone on this site seems to know hands down she wanted an orgy and Im curious how do you know?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
How many times did she come that night while being high?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
Zero. Shouldn't take 7 men and 7 hours. Something is defunct with this btch.
 
Maybe a lesbo.
Anonymous
If y'all wanna claim that she raped the men. The men deserved it anyway. Y'all like rapists anyway.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Don't blame me because you make it too easy ;)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Nobody deserves rape. But you have to make consistent judgements.
Anonymous
Do you guys think this case should have been handled privately?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Nothing is private in a gamgbang.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
gangbangs should be illegal with death penalty

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
should be even more public, let everyone scrutinize both sides
Anonymous
How would you guys react if it was a man who got raped instead?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Allegedly, it was. Matthew Ingalls.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Depends where he was probed and what she looks like.
If rapist looks like this whore and got probed from behind then he the victim.
If she is 10 out of 10, then he better buy her something nice.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
"those other girls shouldn't have been"
" I couldn't consent after I snorted K off your busy"

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
lol
Anonymous
What are you all’s opinion about rape? Is it ever moral?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Thoughts on feminist giving advice that " if he ghosts you, then he is a rapist."
 
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1406927924366708/

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

J @janedoe2
RAPE ME, BABY!
Comment attachment by janedoe2

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Depends on the definition. A girl got drunk, enjoyed a gang bang, but still claim she cannot have consent? If you define that as a rape, then rape can be moral.
Anonymous
Death to the patriarchy

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Haha...know why matriarchy doesn't exist? women hate working for other women.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Trump is your President

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
We don’t even know if this girl is the right person so you’re the false accuser too. Fuck all men.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
LOL, Lucy H Craig is the one.....
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Death to false accusations and frenzy #mee tooo

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
I only speak English

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Ok goy
Anonymous
All of you are rapists

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
"I know how to support a girl accused of making false accusations, I will make false accusations in her name!"

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
You are a potential false accuser. #mee tooo

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
You’re the hoe with a thousand bodies

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Shes just a ho
..
Anonymous
Jeez Ivy League whores get to much attention from activist cattle. What about Zarutska? She literally flew from warzone and was murdered by filthy nigger in broad daylight. Where are the protests? Maybe someone share killer identity over goytok? U all just forget it already. But yeah, when some rich dumb bitch snort drugs from some cock it will blow up like crazy. U are literally rape cattle made to serve ur overlords

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Doesn't serve any purpose. Cornell7 serves Democrats narratives for midterms. ...but it is a trap. Let them sink.
Anonymous
Oh, so doxxing lone juror is ok while, in this case, every faggot start seething about privacy of some cum dump whore?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
The cunts were fine with doxxing when it was the accused, hilarious to watch them rrrRAGE now that the shoe is on the other foot

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1
This comment is spot on and makes a lot of sense.
 
For me, I subscribe to the goose and gander theory.
Anonymous
Down with Israel and down with the united states!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
A comment I can get down with!
Anonymous
I would fuck her too, but not after 3 threesomes...thats how you get aids

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
condom?
Anonymous
If that's her, she is way better looking than Megyn Kelly

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
You must be blind
Anonymous
Well between this and Lindsay Clancy, I think the Overton Window has well and truly shifted on the sacred cow of Feminism and female accountability

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
It's about to go handmaids tale on these women lol

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Wow what a loser. Bet youve never been touched by a woman. irl you're probably so disgusting to look at and be around no woman will get close to you. News flash the fault is your own little incel.
Anonymous
I am pradeep from India. 6 ft tall. 69/ y/o. Wealthy and successful. Looking to find nice white woman. Hmu

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
You racist incels are so disgustingly desperate for attention. Embarrassing, really.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
How wealthy are we talking?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Saaaar pls send boobs and vagene saaaar I'm horny Indian saaar

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Why are lndians like this

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
whaaa??
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
whaaa??
Comment attachment by Anonymous
Anonymous
Gotdamn, hoes fuckin mad in here

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
You must be talking about your mom
@janedoe1
We do not care what you say or post (it is up to you to decide). POST ANYTHING ANONYMOUSLY AND WITH FREEDOM FROM CENSORSHIP. Whichever side of the arguement you are on, we do not care and pronote public debate to the fullest.
 
However, don't spam the comments with thousands of the same, duplicated, nonsensical paragraphs. YOU ARE NOT HURTING US, WE WILL SIMPLY BULK DELETE THEM WHEN WE HAVE TIME.
 
New article coming soon. Debate away. This is the only source online about this topic that cannot be censored or deleted.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous
nice work.
Anonymous
jail her...
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
This is when she just thought she agreed to a threesome you idiot.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
when the other guys entered she said no to anal, which they respected, but she gave consent to snorting K off her body. When she said I'm tired they told her she didnt need to keep going and could lay down.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
This is when she just thought she agreed to a threesome you idiot.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
First you say the messages can’t be trusted (they’ve been verified) and then you go in on him apologising (most likely because it became a scandal) while you ignore that she herself affirms it wasn’t rape in her very response. You can’t be reasoned with.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
So you know what? this image doesn’t have any clear evidence it’s real due to the unclear formatting and lack of of a physical phone along with the screenshot shown. Those supposed snapchat screenshots looked more convincing than this. Unless whoever has this alleged iMessage screenshot can actually take out their physical phone and record proof it’s a real, unedited message just like those snapchat screenshots, I don’t believe this one. Let’s say it was real hypothetically. Tell me why one of the accused guy’s himself is apologizing for something, messaged her first, and added things “got out of hand” what would out of hand mean in this context? Sounds kind of suspicious to me in the least. What did he want to shut down? Why? If this alleged screenshot is indeed true, tell me, why were all of these specific key words said? Also, notice how the secondary message supposedly from the alleged victim is cut off and not shown, why is this? All reposts of this specific alleged message going around never include the second paragraph of that message, so tell me, why is that? What reason is given from the supposed doxxers to never include that part? Let’s say this screenshot was indeed true, what is stopping anyone from hiding the second paragraph? Could it possibly contain more information proving the likelihood of the alleged rape(s)?
 
Besides that, if we continue the hypothetical scenario this screenshot is indeed true, people must realize this communication was supposedly made very soon after the alleged assault of Jane Doe. Many victims of sexual assault and/or rape soon after the incident, no matter the gender of the victim, have a tendency to deny what happened to them at first or “flaunt”. The reason for this common behaviour from most victims usually has various explanations as to why their brains mentally deny their assault(s) at first. However, more often than not they later on come to realization of what really happened to them. Their brains usually stop using a mental shield to protect themselves from severe trauma, such protection is only temporary. It is a common process our brains use to cope with severe psychological traumatic impact. Again, there are plenty varied valid reasons besides this one. It’s safer to assume this is the case for the victim, Jane Doe, rather than automatically assume it’s a false accusation. Nearly all victims of sexual assault and/or rape exhibit symptoms of temporary denial, forgetfulness of events and specific dates, and lack of evidence.
 
Remember, there is no perfect victim. Many, many victims make regretful mistakes themselves, but obviously never ones as bad as the attackers/perpetrators themselves of course. The best thing we can all do for now is safely assume the woman sharing her experiences of rape and trying to make her voice heard is telling the truth. In the end, it’s always much more reasonable to let the victim’s voice be heard, and believe a potential victim rather than one (or in this case allegedly) multiple rapists.
Anonymous
1488