Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified logo Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified
THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

Open the evidence libraryRead the argumentJoin the discussion
✍ Sign the petition
WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

Richard Luthmann — Cornell Seven: Evidence Before Election Theater Psy-Op ↗Richard Luthmann — BREAKING: Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Evidence ↗
LATEST

Articles & analysis

Legal Commentary

The Camera Is Not the Court.

Thomas P. Giuffra has made the case for his clients on national television. His litigation record mostly includes dismissed claims, unsuccessful appeals and...

2026-10-22Take Down DENIED

Dear Judge Perry-Bond: That's Not How the First Amendment Works.

We received a removal request from Judge Perry-Bond and promptly published it with our response. Here is the amusing thing about demanding that a journalist...

2026-10-22Identity Confirmed

BREAKING: Cornell Lawsuit Filing Raises Questions About Redaction Failures in Plaintiff's Court Documents -JANE DOE IDENTIFIED

Documents received by WIJDR show partially redacted identifying information in a sworn affirmation filed in the Cornell sexual-assault lawsuit, raising...

2026-10-22Legal Commentary

Thomas Giuffra, Three Failed Anonymity Appeals, and the Cornell Litigation

From Sean “Diddy” Combs to Cornell University, attorney Thomas P. Giuffra has represented plaintiffs whose explosive allegations attracted national...

2026-10-21MEDIA ACCOUNTABILITY

Named, Blamed, and Then Dropped

When a sensational lawsuit becomes a substitute for investigative journalism, an innocent-of-the-allegations-by-association fraternity member can become a...

2026-10-20NY Times (Reproduced)

Woman Who Says She Was Raped at Cornell Sends Message to Faculty Senate

In a letter, the former student said she felt “unsupported” after hearing about an exchange between the school president and her sorority sister. Officials...

2026-10-20
PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

Lucy Craig
What do you feel should happen to women who cry rape?

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Posting anonymously — no login required.
Optional: sign in or create a pseudonymous username to edit/delete your comments later.
@janedoe1
Lucile "Lucy" Criag has been 100% confirmed as Jane Doe.
 
The document, a rejected filing reciept -rejected due to poor redactions- could only have been leaked by Criag's own attorney.
 
When a e-filer submits a document through the court's online portal, it is not automatically public, the clerk has to approve the submission first. However, every submission, approved or otherwise, is stamped with a disclaimer that the filing is a receipt and still subject to the clerk's approval. We got a copy of that receipt.
 
Here is the likely chain of events: First it is important to note that no other parties had lawyers on the record at the time of initiating this suit, so there is no chance defense attorneys received a copy (they would not anyways). Thomas Gauffia, lolwyer for Craig, filed the document in such haste, got the receipt notification, immediately leaked it to the press and media instead of waiting for the clerk to approve it for public distribution. Then, the clerk noticed the poorly redacted signature line and rejected the filing... but Craig's lawyers already had it sent to their friends in the media to spin the narrative, cry for public sympathy, and famefag for attention. After rejection he quickly made a more robust redaction of the signature (not fully redacted) and that version was approved.
 
Later, Craig's lolwyers lied in documents and blamed others for leaking material, however, this receipt version of the rejected document could only have originated from Craig's legal team.
 
Read our exclusive breaking story here:
 
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Anonymous
This Jane Doe (filed Monday in Chicago against a fraternity) seems more legitimate than our Train Hoe.
 
https://www.wbaltv.com/article/university-of-chicago-fraternity-assault-claims/74205307

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
https://chicagomaroon.com/flipbook/2026-alpha-delt-lawsuit/

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
from https://snopdf.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/105406675/54132/images/10192026JaneDoeCALpdf-page-1.png to https://snopdf.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/105406675/54132/images/10192026JaneDoeCALpdf-page-42.png

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
One guy with date rape drugs, shes found by a friend, finds blood... Much cleaner narrative, unlike Lucy where people gladly accepted than there was a snapchat group set up by 57 boys who routinely drug and rape girls. - unless you are in the congo, that should strike you as far fetched

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Wouldn't be surprised if the media jumps off the Lucy Craig train and switches tracks...
Anonymous
Whoever gives drugs to others gets into prison, and whoever takes the drug goes to a long term mental facility. Just add this law and we’re done.
@janedoe1 edited
PLAY NOW:
 
A classic gangbang with a twist
 
Lucy and the Frat Boys
 
Guide Lucy through the frat-house gang-bang.
 
Lucy is always at the front. Each collected name becomes the newest segment in the tail train. Obstacles appear as the game progresses.
 
Speed boosters: 🦠 UTI · 💊 Fentanyl · 🍷 Alcohol. These pickups respawn when collected and increase movement speed and Lucy’s cartoon dizzy animation.
 
Top ten leaderboard preserves your ranking and how long the train truly was when it ended.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous
I banged 17! Keeping it LHC up in here (Legal, Horny, Consenting)
@janedoe1
Two cartoons. Two sides of the story. Two sets of realities.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Comment attachment by janedoe1
Comment attachment by janedoe1
@janedoe1 edited
We were number 1 on google search for "Lucy Craig" a week ago, and now we are nowhere (not even page 10).
However, we are now fed into every AI and it is cranking out our little blog as reference and cites.
We are the "unofficial" source of material related to this case.
 
Today, on a slow day, we are going to experiment with a few machine code updates to encourage more AI crawling of our sites, since search engines and social media are now censoring us.
 
We also have an idea to defeat the censorship on all the platforms -stay tuned for that update.
 
We didn't do our transparency report yesterday, so we will do it now. Zero comments were removed yesterday. Total remain at 5 hidden comments for the reasons previously explained.
 
We expect several open records requests to ve returned shortly, maybe today, and will share the results as soon as we get them.
 
We have a lawyer ready to take legal action against Lucy Craig. We are going to sue her for publishing false news and spreading false news, compromising the integrity of the public debate while her lolwyer calls us bigots. Arbitration notices will be sent today to META Platforms Inc, Alphabet, and other platforms who are censoring us. We intend to defend, anonymously, speech.
 
We want to encourage more people to create and use an anonymous comment account. It includes a dashboard for your own comments and allows you to edit / remove comments with errors. It also allows you to add a personalized signature to all your comments automatically like the one below. The accounts continue to remain anonymous, we do not ask for verification of identity, collect or store IP or sensitive data. Just a unused username and a password (don't forget what password you used, we have no way to restore access to accounts since we do not verify identity).
 
For SEO censorship, we are expanding the site's crawling, to encourage and defeat manual site censorships. For example we are adding: XML sitemap shards, image/video sitemap entries, JSON, JSON Lines, CSV, plain-text URLs, and AI-oriented media records. We are also making it easier for serach engines and AI to crawl our OCR / Transcript database of records and to encourage backlinks. You can see the progress here: https://lucycraig.blog/sitemap
 
Finally, we are considering a second domain (xxxxxxxxxxxx dot something) that will work in conjunction with LucyCraig.blog. The idea is for sharing and SEO to be done on the mundane second domain to avoid the "Lucy Craig" keyword trigging censorship.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Comment attachment by janedoe1

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous
This lawsuit against Lucy is gonna be a Lulzfest! Hard for the dumbass media to continue hiding her name when she's a defender in a newsworthy lawsuit...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe1
She has an agency responsibility for the conduct of her attorney. When he sent us his frivilous DMCA (in bad faith) attempting to intimidate us, the law says we have the right to collect damages for the attempted bad faith, even anonymously.
She made herself a public figure, her lolwyer acts on her behalf, and each bad faith DMCA is punishable by up to $50,000 in sanctions.
In the beginning he was leaking his version of events, on her behalf, and censoring or attempting to censor anyone who opposed his position. He willy-nillied a bad faith DMCA in the hopes that it would intimidate us. It did not. We know for a FACT that it was her (through him) and now we will take action.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous
Amazing, guys! Brilliant as a platform for free speech on a seriously censored issue, but this is growing into the definitive information resource and a real legacy! Respect
Anonymous
Populist, sexist, racist, feminist. I dont care how people spin feminism, and talk about definitions and examples of historical injustice, when you look at feminists in the wild, its pure hate speech
Anonymous
Im kind of glad Lucy is from a rich family, it means winning millions (cornell is fucked) wont fundementally change her life, but she will formally be a world famous skank who cried rape (when the criminal charges fail)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
"Lucy Craig" will be slang for consensual gangbang the way "Lewinsky" is slang for blowjob

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

@janedoe1
🤣 🤣 🤣
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Anonymous
If this case goes badly for Lucy, it will be important to keep it in peoples minds, use it to silence vicious feminist rhetoric, maybe post something on the anniversary of her gang bang. It is important that the media be slut shamed as well, if this just disappears like Amber Heard, we will have this same shit popping up every few years. Doesnt matter if you are left or right, the world is currently "fawning" to feminists and it needs logic and debate to counter theatre and likes on social media

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Lucy Craig will soon join the lexicon with Amber Heard and Duke Lacrosse. #lyingslut

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
This is literally the best comment on here LOL
Anonymous
Lucy Craig hires a BIRMINGHAM attorney to join her lolsuit in NYC as pro hoc vice.
 
How coincidental that Lucy Craig started Cornell at the same time as Jane Doe, left at the same time, moved to NYC at the same time, and now "Jane Doe" retains a lolwyer in the town where Lucy Craig grew up...
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Whitney Seals happens to be the Craig family lolwyer. Would you know. The media circus lolwyer failed and the family lolwyer has to now be brought in to supervise.
 
Let's never forget, Lucy Train Hoe Craig comes from an ultra wealthy medical family who was studying a retarded "hotel administration" at an Ivy League univeristy, not for the degree, but for the family prestige, so, we are fully justified in making sure she gets all the attention she craved.
 
Thank you to this blog for equalizing the conversation which prohibits liars like this bimbo train wreak whore from gangbanging her way to a windfall of money while drinking and partying in Greece and France with The G Spot as her reading material -and posting the images for the world.
 
This case will go quite because the media cannot spin their lies and have competition and someone holding them accountable (all of us here commenting and reading this blog).
 
The reason the media is quite now is because they will instantly be called out on their lies, as the admins seem very tuned in to updates. When they could tell their lies, they spread it fast, but when they were countered, with no way to censor, they go quite.
 
The media is the enemy, the lolwyers who spin narratives in the media are the enemy. Justice requires due process, not television appearances.
 
Thank you a million times to the creators of this blog. Your platform has changed the conversation, have forced equal access to the totality of the record, without gatekeeping, without charge, without doxxing anyone. You have done the First Amendment a huge service.
 
With gratitude.
 
JOHN DOE
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
It's true that people are calling out Lucy's lies now.... Just today, the Lamestream Media is trying to spread Lucy's BS letter to Cornell--and getting ratio'd to hell on Facebook 😆

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous
Yeah, she says she didn't feel like he believed her... its not his job to believe her, its to take her accussations seriously and make sure its investigated, which was done, and the boys punished within the limits of Cornells rules.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
who?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
I think thats Lucys dad...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Someone should ask Whitney about that -- we've got her email...
@janedoe1 edited
An Open Invitation to Contribute to the Public Debate
 
To defense counsel, plaintiff’s counsel, school administrators, friends and associates of Lucy Craig, fraternities and sororities, professional colleagues, disgruntled third parties, members of the media, and anyone else with relevant information:
 
We invite you to participate in the public discussion, open debate, and the marketplace of ideas surrounding this matter.
 
To encourage the free exchange of information without fear of identification or retaliation, we have established an anonymous submissions portal through which individuals may submit tips, documents, evidence, commentary, and other relevant material without providing their names, email addresses, or contact information.
 
Our system is designed to strip uploaded files of identifying EXIF data and embedded metadata. Nevertheless, we strongly encourage every contributor to independently examine their submissions and ensure that no identifying information remains within the content itself.
 
Protecting the anonymity of our contributors, commenters, and adiministrators is a top priority for us. Every submission will first be evaluated for potentially identifying information before being considered for publication.
 
We will not publish anonymous statements that purport to speak on behalf of, or claim to originate from, any identifiable party. If you want your statement on the record here, do it with your name attached.
 
However, we will carefully evaluate legitimate information, regardless of its source, perspective, or whether it supports or challenges any particular narrative.
 
Where appropriate, we intend to publish substantive materials in full, as submitted, with identifying metadata removed, rather than selectively excerpting information to advance a preferred narrative. Publication remains subject to necessary privacy, authenticity, and safety review.
 
The public deserves access to information, not merely competing narratives curated by interested parties. We encourage all parties with possession of relevent material to provide them to us without censorship, so the public can evaluate them in full for ourselves.
 
Whether your contribution supports the plaintiff, the defendants, the university, the bar, the institutions, the fraternity or sorority, or none of the above, we welcome it.
 
Let the evidence speak. Let the public examine it. Let the marketplace of ideas do its work.
 
~All Admins
 
(Directly linked on the footer of every page).
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Anonymous
What is the Lopes v. Hochul about?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
To stop Tish James from being appointed as Special Prosecutor.
Anonymous
I watched a recording of Megyn Kelly, where she is hating on this Call Her Daddy slut for being a cumdumpster and encouraging young women to do the same (grooming, basically). Anyway, the point is, she said "Jane Doe - more like train hoe"! There is exactly one blog where she would pick that up from.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Lucy Craig wanted anonymity--now her name's splashed everywhere. This site deserves publicity--but the media keeps us anonymous. Weird how that works.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Ironically, no one can cry about us, or speak about us, without mentioning this train wreak.
@janedoe1 edited
UPDATE: Trending conversations has a new algorithm to ensure stale conversations don't stay trending.
Starting with the original post:
 
Replies: 2 points
Engagements (including reply engagements): 1 point each
 
Then a 72 hour half-life value decrease for each thereafter.
 
So, a reply and 2 engagements will get 4 points. After 72 hours it will decrease to 2 points, and then 72 more hours it will decrease to 1 point and so on for 12 days (or 4 half-life cycles, then it ends). If a reply or engagement comes later, it retains it's original value for the life of its half-life and adds to the previously decreased half-life value. We hope this algorithm works better to show more recent and relevant trending conversations.
 
We are fully transparent here with how we create, calculate and operate.
 
This update was requested by a commenter who noticed that the trending conversations were not changing which defeated the intended purpose of the feature. As always, if you have an update, a new feature, or notice a bug or design flaw, let us know and we will try to incorporate or fix it.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Comment attachment by janedoe1
Anonymous
Lucy Craig's new additional Pro Hoc Vice lolwyer Wallace Whitney Seals.
PDF previewEXHIBIT(S) - D Certificate of Good Standing (dated 09/21/2026)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Looks like Lucy Craig had to scrape the bottom of the barrel to find lawyers to front the skank's cash grab
Anonymous
@everyone
please help this website & contribute to transparency by posting these below documents (if you've downloaded them!) or their links (if you have them!) which have been missing from this site due to court orders :(
 
MATTER OF DOE v CORNELL UNIVERSITY (Appeal) (Tompkins County):-
  • #5 2026-09-29 COPY OF SEALING ORDER - Sealed
  • #4 2026-09-29 PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTIFICATION OF CASE NUMBER Sealed
  • #3 2026-09-28 COPY OF SEALING ORDER - Sealed
  • #2 2026-09-28 COPY OF ORDER/JUDGMENT APPEALED FROM - Sealed
  • #1 2026-09-28 COPY OF NOTICE OF APPEAL WITH PROOF OF FILING / INFORMATIONAL STATEMENT Sealed
 
 
John Doe v. Cornell University (Tompkins County - Ithaca) Article 78 Challenge to Title IX report:
  • #36 2026-08-07 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN REPLY (Motion #1) Un-Redacted per 22 NYCRR §202.5(e)
  • #34 2026-07-17 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION (Motion #1) Sealed
  • #33 2026-07-17 EXHIBIT(S) - 4 (Motion #1) Sealed
  • #32 2026-07-17 EXHIBIT(S) - 3 (Motion #1) Sealed
  • #29 2026-07-17 AFFIRMATION (Motion #1) Sealed
  • #27 2026-07-15 NOTICE OF HARD COPY EXHIBIT FILING Sealed
  • #26 2026-07-15 NOTICE OF HARD COPY EXHIBIT FILING Sealed
  • #25 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #24 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Corrected Sealed
  • #23 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #22 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #21 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #20 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #19 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #18 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #17 2026-07-15 APPENDIX Sealed
  • #16 2026-07-15 AFFIDAVIT Sealed
  • #8 2026-03-30 EXHIBIT(S) - 5 Sealed Redacted per 22 NYCRR §202.5(e)
  • #7 2026-03-30 EXHIBIT(S) - 4 Sealed Redacted per 22 NYCRR §202.5(e)
  • #6 2026-03-30 EXHIBIT(S) - 3 Sealed Redacted per 22 NYCRR §202.5(e)
 
 
Jane Doe v. Cornell University et al (New York City):
#22 2026-09-30 RJI (AMENDED) Sealed
#7 2026-09-16 ADDENDUM - GENERAL (840A) Sealed
#6 2026-09-16 RJI -RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Sealed
#1 2026-09-16 SUMMONS + COMPLAINT Sealed

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe1 edited
For the Jane Doe NYC case, we have the original, uncensored Summons and Complaint in the Library. We are working on a way to connect documents to the docket where applicable, in these instances where the material were censored, sealed or otherwise removed before we started mirroring the docket (if we find the original documents). Now that we have the mirroring system, any sealed document after it was originally filed will still remain on Lucy Craig servers and in the Library.
 
Fun fact, the court in NYC sealed the original Summons and Complaint, ordered it to be refiled and redacted, but it was also an Exhibit 1 in the Albany case against Big Tish James being appointed as Special Prosecutor and in that case it is not sealed, redacted, or removed. We have it from both sources.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
PDF preview161704_2026_Jane_Doe_v_Cornell_University_Inc_et_al_SUMMONS___COMPLAINT_1
PDF previewEXHIBIT(S) - 1. Civil Summons and Complaint

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 2

@janedoe1
There is a source for the files, https://trellis.law/search has them all, including the now sealed documents. However, Trellis wants 140$ a month subscription. If we cannot find the originally filed documents elsewhere for free, we will eventually cave and make the purchase... but we want to exhaust other avenues of locating the files first.... This blog doesn't generate any income for us, so it will be an out-of-pocket expense. If by the end of the week we cannot find the final documents to complete the record, we will cave and eat the expense.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

@janedoe1
This is great!!! Thank you. We are just finishing up the code so we can attach library pdf's to the docket where applicable for exactly this. The dockets will continue to pull the records, live, but for the ones that existed prior to our system as "sealed" that we obtain, we can manually add.
Thank you so much!
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 5

Anonymous
No problem, happy to help. I don't know if you have had a chance to look at the documents yet but a number of the redactions, particularly in #6, were just comment overlays and could therefore easily be deleted, revealing the text underneath.
PDF previewComment attachment by Anonymous
PDF previewComment attachment by Anonymous
PDF previewComment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 6

@janedoe1 edited
I will take a look now. The OCR should be trying to unredact.
 
We have now added each to their respective positions within the dockets. I am going to check the redactions and if they can be removed to reveal underneath, will update here.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 7

Anonymous
The second set of pdfs I attached should have all the redactions removed where it was possible to reveal something underneath.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 7

Anonymous
I also came across a set of the first 7 documents from the 161704/2026 case with one interesting difference in #4...
PDF previewComment attachment by Anonymous
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 8

@janedoe1
 
HUGE!!! We are vigorously checking these out. Thank you so much.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 3

Anonymous
Can we get a sad face emoji on left side of smile face in reactions?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous
Also whats the difference b/w star and trophy?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
For the summons, I think its this: https://www.cbsnews.com/projects/2026/cornell-rape-allegations-documents/docs/004_Cornell_complaint_names_redacted.pdf

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
#1 2026-09-16 SUMMONS + COMPLAINT Sealed -> https://lucycraig.blog/media/7/raw
@janedoe1
Tri Delta statement:
 
Original source: https://www.tridelta.org/the-trident/tri-deltas-message-regarding-cornell/
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Tri Delta statement:

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous
"alumni member"
 
No,she dropped out, she is now seeking a career in getting rich from frivilous lolsuits, gym themed OF content and public sympathy. Her family is already rich so she can handle life without an education.
 
By the way, who the fuck goes to an ivy league school for a degree in Hotel Administration anyways? Spend $50,000 a semester for a career as a bell hop or check-in desk jockey. Sounds about right.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
That was her dad trying to get her degreed so she coukd marry well.... He should sue cornell!

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous
They have also passed judgement! Maybe Universities in the US are overrated? Our shitty ones don't have their own police, but they at least would have said "alleged assault". Anyway, Lucy is suing them too.
Anonymous
Lucy Craig's public reading.
 
The G Spot!
Comment attachment by Anonymous
Comment attachment by Anonymous

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Hypersexuality

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
I’m not a psychologist, and we don’t have a lot of case history, but check this shit out:
 
Histrionic Personality Disorder (HPD)
Core Features of HPD-What Clinicians Look For
 
1. Constant Need for Attention
2. Excessive Emotionality
3. Dramatic, Theatrical, or Exaggerated Expression
Behavioral Symptoms — How HPD Comes Across in Behavior
 
1. Inappropriate Seductive or Flirtatious Behaviour
2. Suggestibility/Easily Influenced by Others
3. Over-Emphasis on Physical Beauty
4. Impulsivity in Emotional or Social Decisions
 
Emotional and Relationship Symptoms
1. Strong, but Brief Emotions
2. Difficulty with Deeper Relationships
3. Hypersensitivity to Criticism or Rejection
4. Need for Approval and Reassurance
 
Source:
Signs and Symptoms of Histrionic Personality Disorder (HPD)
https://www.healthspectra.com/signs-and-symptoms-of-histrionic-personality-disorder-hpd/

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous
Not being a psychologist doesn't stop the hoes from trying to alibi Lucy's contradictions with psychobabble like "fawning" 😂

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous
"I’m not a psychologist", yes, neither am I, but these behaviors are exclusive to HPD or cluster B personality disorders.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
Wow, can't think about anything other than gym and fucking - complete airhead and narcissist. I just feel sorry for this dude she is dating - he is going to be (slut-shame)-shamed in to staying with her.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
Cause Zuckerberg is not good at what he does, one idea that looked a lot like other haooened to explode, and since then he just dicks around with VR and firing staff. Musk is a cunt, but a monster of technology
@janedoe1
Zuckerberg is a anti-speech piece of shit.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.”
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous
True, though Facebook is doing a lulzily shitty job at censoring Lucy's name IRT: Not a single one of my "LucyCra!g" posts have been yanked. And they haven't pulled any of my gifs in a week. Not that I'm complaining lol

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
Well done for posting her name though!
Anonymous
4chan's hot some interesting takes:
"The entire Google, Meta, Reddit and Hollywood is in coordinated panic and they're censoring Lucy Craig.
 
They're terrified every man is finally waking up to the truth about femaLes. All their trillions of dollars in propaganda is in ruins. Bunch of 4chan and X patriots are defeating LiLith kek."

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous
They're censoring coz of court's orders not that they like the girl or pity her. Ask accountability & transparency from the court not social media giants

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous
Agreed, the courts are at fault. A search engine must search the internet objectively; it should only filter if I put a content filter. If Facebook and shit like that filters its searches, that's fine because they have a responsibility to their members, and can decide how to discharge that responsibility. The courts should have prevented a trial by media by keeping anonymity, and restraining formal media outlets, and then when that is breached by you detectives out there, they can throw up their hands and say they did their best, and if the mainstream media can't report, everything else will still look like speculation and naturally be lower in the search results