Dear Judge Perry-Bond: That's Not How the First Amendment Works.
An apparent DeleteMe removal demand. The wrong federal statute. A spectacularly defective legal theory. A public judicial record. And now a formal 72-hour demand for withdrawal and an explanation.
Published 2026-10-22 21:27 UTC · Updated 2026-10-22 22:43 UTC
WIJDR Response to DeleteMe Legal SubmissionMedia Metadata ›
Select to load OCR and transcript, when available.
Source discipline: This article may contain allegations, disputed claims, quotations, and editorial analysis. Follow the linked evidence pages and cited sources to inspect context before drawing conclusions.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
Comments & replies
No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.
Anonymous
Looks like someone uploaded the article to archive.ph. #insurance
Anonymous
Does the First Amendment allow us to tell Phaedra F. Perry-Bond to go snort ket off a cock? 🤔
J@janedoe2
I love how they quote federal law and then say that federal law doesn't apply to a New York State judge. Clowns. Dollars to donuts that DeleteMe was hired by someone in the NYS Office of Court Administration with taxpayer dollars. Judge Perry-Bond didn't spend her own money because there are two things that don't pay: crime and judges.
@janedoe1
NEW ARTICLE: Dear Judge Perry-Bond: A Privacy Request Is Not a Delete Key.
Judge Perry-Bond retains DeleteMe.com to serve LucyCraig.blog with takedown demands. We promptly respond publicly. WE WILL NOT DELETE ANYTHING, AND WILL NOW ADD MORE TO THE RECORD.
GFY.
“The fact that society may find speech offensive is not a sufficient reason for suppressing it.” -Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.
Search WIJDR
Search while keeping your current page and comment draft open.
-Chief Justice William Rehnquist, majority opinion, 485 U.S. at 55.