Lucy Craig is Jane Doe - 100% Verified
Explore published articles, public conversations, media, OCR, transcripts and preserved court records. Search-engine and AI indexes update automatically as public material is published.
She recalled being heavily intoxicated due to alcohol and additionally impaired due to ketamine and whatever other drugs she was on... and we are expected to believe she recalled the night with such clarity? You can't have it both ways
And that is the truth.. misandry reigns supreme
Only redheads do that
100% Anthony Albononsense from Australia has joined the mud sliding rainbow liberal train in support if Lindsay Clancy and Lucy Craig. Initials both LC.. you can't make this up
Why would it matter? Reaching orgasm when raped is common, it does not mean that it was consensual or that the victim wanted or enjoyed it.
Clearly not, else she wouldn't have said it was rape.
Thank you. I don't know if "anonymous" is an username now or not, but I have implemented a small change that will display the word "edited" after the date and time stamp if a comment is edited moving forward.
Nope, we're actually the only ones coming with coherent takes and valid evidence. You people can only come with some bullshit like "some of the men were too drunk to consent, that means the victim raped her perpetrators". Like nobody w
By calling her “Big” Tish James, The admins and creators of this site Expose their bias.
By the site calling Doe’s attorney A “lolwyer” This site exposes Its creators bias. They say it’s about free-speech, But that lie is just a cover.
Nah, You have an opinion. Thats why you started this site. Otherwise you would attach a nickname to the frat bros, like you have lolwyer and Big James……. But of course, you haven’t. You’re just as lowly as the lawyer.
The "evidence" that supposedly shows her texting her friends while it happened are bogus. Just read the time stamps of the messages, 6pm, 9pm that was hours before the alleged assault took place. Maybe, just maybe, could you make the a
What should be a serious discussion about consent, right to privacy, biased narratives, public rush to judgement, slut shaming, and college / Greek culture…….. Falls into the abyss of right wing misogynists, and left wing man haters.
What should be a serious discussion about consent, right to privacy, biased narratives, public rush to judgement, slut shaming, and college / Greek culture…….. Falls into the abyss of right wing misogynists, and left wing man haters.
I'm sorry if I came off as rude there, I get that remaining civil is best to get ones point across, but I just think it's so disgusting to do this to a potential rape victim. Like even devils like Putin and Netanyahu wouldn't have the
She replied to a text from her sorry sister at 3:05 am.
If being drunk means you can’t give consent to sex, Then 2/3rds of college undergrads are rapists, Regardless of their gender.
What does that prove though? That a heavily intoxicated and drugged woman texted her sister, that's all that it proves. We have all been very drunk at least once in our life, and you know damn well that when we're that intoxicated we d
You're only allowed to show men are evil oppressors and women are innocent victims. Delete this.
When you headucate a woman, you headucate a village, as the feminist saying goes. What's the cross over of Train Hoe and Lyndsey Clancey supporters?
If anything tat says more about how fucked up our society is than it says about this case. That she was drunk isn't even the big problem here, the biggest problem is what the 7 did. It wasn't just another casual sexual encounter, it wa
Nobody is saying this. You're arguing against a straw-man opponent that you made up in your own mind. We're simply arguing that she was taken advantage of based on the evidence that we have seen. Just calling us feminists or misandrist
Read her report to Cornell, posted on this site. She clearly states she told these "bros" she didn't want to do some things, and they complied. She never asked to leave and never asked for help (even in her 3:05am text). Some frat bros
If you want to support the victim in this case, you can go to cornellseven.com, or directly to change.org, and become one of the currently 69,014 verified signatories in supporting the Cornell vicimg Jane Doe. The petition is titled "C
Read her report to Cornell, posted on this site. She clearly states she told these "bros" she didn't want to do some things, and they complied. She never asked to leave and never asked for help (even in her 3:05am text). Some frat bros
The site owner is deleting comments mentioning legitimate websites and petitions supporting the victim. In other words he's silencing and censoring Jane Doe supporters, this does not align with the blog owners own expressed goal of a s
She enjoyed a gang bang night, hard to say she is a victim. But she is indeed a victim of being judged as a slut by sorority sis.
Moderator, How do you decide what comments to keep vs which ons you delete? Because you are clearly deleting comments / replies.
I am deleting your comments that call for cancel culture. Also, if you want to spam some other website, do it on other platforms, this is not a self promotional comment section. Do that on social media, it ruins the experience for ever
WDYM taking advantage of her. She sucked so many dicks, did ketamine of others’ dick, banged so many times, and importantly, every time when she says no the boys stopped, such as foursome, anal… She was clearly enjoying
It’s criminal to use her name. You are in contempt of court as you are putting her life in danger. You will be reported to the judge.
that would be surprising, because there is a shit-ton of stuff on here supporting her, mocking the operators, etc... maybe you feel in to a k-hole and hallucinated the whole thing?
Blah blah blah
Yes, the only speech should be illegal is the speech that tries to eliminate others’ speech.
So you support censorship..... sad.
You should only have free speech when you don’t try to cancel others’ free speech.
The petition that I am referring to below does NOT call for the cancellation of anything or anyone, it's strictly a petition to support the potential victim of rape. Change.org: become one of the over 68000 people to sign a petition su
Ok, so by your logic the site owner should not have free speech, because he's cancelling ours? We dont even call for cancellations or anything, we're here engaging with you guys and your perspective, aren't we?
Good morning, everyone. Overnight, a whackadoodle decided to flood our comment section with repeated demands to “report” this site, while simultaneously promoting their own website, which appears to offer a decidedly one-sided version
Would you like me to post your comments, in full? You literally posted calls to report this site to various alleged providers for the purposes of canceling the site.
The comments like the ones calling to report the site will remain hidden. We did find that one of the comments that was mixed with the calls for cancel culture did not include calls for cancel culture, so it has been restored. Given th
Please stop censoring our speech.
Nope, cancelling cancellers is good.
What a vile comment
Yeah read the comments of that petition. They either obviously did not at all read the documents independently; or they themselves are accusing others for raping, so the more likely explanation is that they know what’s happening, but t
Cornellseven illustrates everything that is wrong in with this story. It publicly sentences 7 (barely) men to a lifetime of ridicule and shame, without a trial, or a conviction. By presenting only one side of the story, and without an
We have restored your appropriate comment. Your MANY other comments commingling calls to cancel us, with third party site promotions will remain hidden for the reasons stated below. And stop fucking spamming. It ruins the experience. P
God does not give us free speech. The 3rd commandment is pure censorship: Thou shall not use the Lords' name in vain.
Also u are falsely identifying someone and putting this girls life in danger - also criminal
So much for the tolerant Left...
I'm glad you created this. No one seems to understand that this is a / a civil case not a criminal case. Essentially a money grab. Hey,I'm off work that's why we have civil courts. I used it once myself. However, I don't think that you
I have wondered the exact same thing.
All that priviledge, oppurtunity and money. Given how economies function, it's all at the cost of others. You can imagine what her parents have done to get there in the sense of what they did to others. The money alone they would have
Let's see if the matriarchal misandrist court system + media apparatus lets Train Doe get away with ruining 7 men's lives for degenerate but consensual sex. Imagine enthusiastically wanting to get dogged down by multiple guys at once a
The confrontation clause must be honored, even if ZOG doesn't want it.
There is not even an order permitting her to proceed as "Jane Doe" that restricts any participant from releasing or saying her name, let alone an order that can touch on a non-party, non-jurisdictional individual who has not had any op
All sexual assault allegations should be regarded as false by default. That's actually what presumed innocence looks like. And you have to take that position even before taking a hard look at her contradictions and changing stories.
Didn't she blow a guy while he was passed out?
If Lucy Craig had as many pricks sticking out of her as she's had stuck in her, she'd be a porcupine
I don't think she's even owed an apology. She made her choice. She put herself in a really bad situation. One poor choice after another after another after another and I think it fears really some examination of, why is it that women c
What essays?
To be a mind reader. Yeah right.
Cry harder. Lucy Craig is a firecrotch trainskank
Lucy Craig tarnished herself with her whoring around
How is it vile? What do you disagree with?
Confused. According to her police report she refused a foursome because she dislike anal, but now she wants 4? Did she anal after all
"humanity shouldn't be trusted with a keyboard" Did (femi)Nazi see that cumming. Unlike Train Hoe who saw a lot of cumming. Except for accountability of which most these whores don't see. How someone can write disgusting shit like that
Probably trying to recruit the slut to their pedo worshipping ranks.
What is the connection between her supporters and Lyndsey Clancy supporters?
> 4,000,000 page views.
She was pissed off that some bros she didnt know well came to the room... You will see in her statements she felt embarressed by so many strangers seeing her poon. You will see from her subsequent texts, she was worried rumours would s
You whackadoodle. Dont gang spam our forum
Jane Doe was a trained sober monitor too, but somehow didnt realise drug fuelled fuck fests could be risky. I wondee if she and males 1 and 2 (ingalls and newell) colluded to sue cornell?
So unethical to spread the gang bang. What happens in Cornell, stays in Cornell.
Ultimately, the argument of people calling for the arrest and conviction of the cornell seven is that men need to be responsible to interpret and decide what women want, as womens' statements cannot trusted in the moment. So much for w