THE RECORD · THE ARGUMENT · THE RESPONSE

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?

Evidence. Due process. Competing narratives. The record deserves scrutiny.

Open the evidence library Read the argument Join the discussion

WHY THIS EXISTS

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

This site is built to present opposition, documentary material, competing interpretations, and public discussion without treating allegations as adjudicated facts. Court records, attributed reporting, editorial argument, and reader comments are labeled as different kinds of material.

REPORTING CREDIT

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

The links below are credited to Richard Luthmann / NY News Press. Linking or discussing them does not convert their assertions into findings of fact.

Richard Luthmann — Cornell Seven: Evidence Before Election Theater Psy-Op ↗Richard Luthmann — BREAKING: Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Accuser Unmasked ↗NY News Press — Cornell Seven Evidence ↗

LATEST

Articles & analysis

Legal Commentary

WHEN A JUDGE CITES A LAW THAT MAY NOT APPLY

Judge Perry-Bond acknowledges the absence of criminal charges, sidesteps the statutory question, and leaves four important New York decisions conspicuously...

2026-10-25

ARTICLE

MAGGIE GANDY: WHO IS THE LAWYER REPORTEDLY BEING CONSIDERED FOR LETITIA JAMES'S CORNELL INVESTIGATION?

A former federal prosecutor, a private practice built partly around sexual-misconduct investigations, and serious unanswered questions about the...

2026-10-25

Legal Commentary

A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR NEEDS A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR?

After publicly expressing support for Lucy Craig, New York Attorney General Letitia James was appointed to independently investigate her allegations. Now...

2026-10-25

ARTICLE

Whitney Seals Wants Cornell to “Right a Wrong.”

The pro hoc vice attorney behind the Cornell lawsuit has embraced a national conversation about accountability. His appellate history, however, offers a...

2026-10-24

Editorial Rebuttal

TO JUSTICE PHAEDRA PERRY-BOND

Our detailed, point-by-point objection to NYSCEF Document No. 86: pseudonymity inside a lawsuit, free expression outside it, the limits of judicial...

2026-10-23

Legal Commentary

The Prosecutor Spoke First

The Governor and Attorney General have filed their opposition to a challenge over Executive Order No. 64. Their 52-page memorandum raises powerful...

2026-10-23

PUBLIC RECORD

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

Every public Library item gets a dedicated page. PDFs are rendered responsively, OCR is searchable, video/audio transcripts are timestamped, and clicking a transcript segment jumps the media to that point.

Browse library

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Loading recent docket filings…

DISCUSSION

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

A Place For Memes
This discussion forums is for all your Lucy Craig, Cornell 7, memes. We want to have the definitive collection of meme art about Lucy Craig.

Big Tish James
Should Big Tish James be involved in the investigation and prosecution of the Cornell 7?

Can a woman consent to sex if she is voluntarily intoxicated?
Lucy Craig engaged in voluntary consumption of alcohol and illegal substances. Is she capable of consent? And if not, are the men, who were also drinking and consuming illegal substances, according to public reporting, capable of consent? Can they claim that they were raped by Lucy Craig?

Did Lucy Craig Rape Those Drunken Boys?
Her texts say she was not drunk. The bar says she was not drunk. The boys were drunk. Did Lucy Craig (AKA "JANE DOE") rape those boys? Leave a comment with your opinion.

Discuss: Should Lucy Craig Sue Thomas Guiffra?
Thomas Guiffra's famefag attention seeking, publicity stunts have backfired. It is now known that he was leaking records related to the case (the poorly redacted afformation in support of proceeding as Jame Doe was only in possession of the person who filed it). He named a U.S. Active Service Marine, lied about a swat event, filed a fake DMCA in bad faith to this blog, named an incorrect person as a defendant, misrepresents New York's dram shop liability laws against Moonies, and named an entity that doesn't actually exists on paper. His hope was, similar to the Comb's cases, to throw shit against the wall, leak favorable documents, cancel anyone who speaks against his client, and sway the public sympathy. That backfired, with help from LucyCraog.blog. As her case becomes a comedy of errors, we ask you, should Lucile H. Craig sue Thomas Guiffra and his firm for malpractice?

Freedom of Speech
We do not care about your feelings, we do care about freedom of speech. Share and post any legal speech you want. Send us your images, videos, text messages, voice recordings or any other related material for immediate publication without censorship.

THE LATEST DISCUSSION

Latest comments

Loading latest comments…

PUBLIC DISCUSSION

Comments & replies

No account is required. Comment anonymously, or sign in with a pseudonymous account if you want to manage your comments later. Comments are user speech, not editorial findings.

Anonymous2026-10-19 15:44 UTC

Why were drugs being allowed in campus in first place? Also wiki says its a date rape drug (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ketamine#Recreational_use).

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 16:40 UTC

Did they really use drugs?

If yes, is it really Ketamine as she claimed?

Did they force her or she volunteered to consume (given she's already alcohol-intoxicated)?

Did anyone of the 8 (JD/LC+C7) thought how will they be seen in society if the act goes out (leaks) into public?

Where are the ethics & morals of all the 8 before the act?

What are the other 50 folks in the chat group doing (mute spectators, willful ignorance, etc)?

Too many questions to aks bruh.......

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 20:33 UTC

I don’t think everyone view a drug sex party negatively.. especially the elite

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 18:40 UTC

Yes to drugs, ketamine seems likely (some dude overdosed on it the week before, but may not have been the only thing they were snorting). In her statement she says yes to Ketamine and actually tries to black out using it, in her civil claim, she says forced. The guys wouldn't have cared about their reputations except now that its a rape case, Lucy didn't think it through, she was crying in her room for days after been slut-shamed around campus - she thought people would be more openminded. In a civil case, they will ask about their views before the case, in the criminal case (which probably won't happen), Lucy's past will probably be off limits (rape shield). The other 50 - this would have been covered in the Cornell investigation, most were probably asleep, these messages got going at 1:45am. Read her statement though, it will give you a good idea of 1) how ditzy she is, 2) How horney she was for Matt, 3) and that only the third 3some was a bit dodgy, but it included Matt, the guy she would do anything for.

Anonymous2026-10-19 13:16 UTC

Hey all you evil misogynistic rape apologists. I'm gonna teach you how to be a good person with basic empathy who cares about victims.

1. Share allegedly faked screenshots saying "she's gone" because you don't have enough real evidence to justify your opinion.

2. Be anti-SA, but wish rape on alleged rapists who have not been proven to have committed the crime, this signals to everyone you are not performative and you care.

3. Assume everyone who disagrees with you is a rapist. You stand with victims, so do us favours by calling everything rape so that no one takes allegations seriously anymore.

4. Assure everyone that intoxication = no consent, even though Jane could say no and did at many points, it doesn't matter that she said yes because she was intoxicated. We have to believe all women, and we can trust her judgment, because she believes they should have stopped when she slurred her words, but she thought it was appropriate to have a threesome with a guy who was heaving and another guy who was passing out.

5. Believe all victims, unless it's Matthew Ingalls, no one takes him seriously, because by believe victims we mean take the moral high ground, fear monger, and push an agenda.

6. Shame everyone for slut shaming, because promiscuity and empowerment couldn't have lead to Jane changing her story from "our bodies our choice nothing illegal happened" to "I was raped" when she got backlash and got uninvited from the next party with her rapists.

7. Fawning, placation, and denial (which are actually real) is a catch all excuse for anything that doesn't add up. There is no rhyme or reason to trauma it's totally random.

8. When you can say no it's normal to wanna pass out instead so you can charge your sexual partners with rape.

9. When you're being raped, it's normal to wonder why your rapists don't care about your sh scars. Being raped isn't actually a bad or scary experience you have no control over, rapists are nice people who should care.

10. If you say no and they stop, that's not good enough you want your cake and to eat it too. Report them all.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe12026-10-19 14:48 UTC

13. Demand single-sided narrative but when you cannot say what you want to say without doxxing yourself, go to the true free-speech platform (LucyCraig.blog) and speak your mind without fear of doxxing and be welcome to express yourself and attempt to persuade others of your position without censorship.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 14:19 UTC

12. DEMAND all 57 guys be doxxed, but crash the fuck out when anyone types "Lucy"

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 16:44 UTC

True. Either everyone should be called as jane/john doe (name reveal post-verdict) or publicize everyone's names! Now those men will be trashed irrespective of whether they were found guilty or not

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-19 17:55 UTC

They're already known tho

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-19 18:45 UTC

#LucysLaw to protect the identities of all involved and limit what can be published in the press (internet creepers will probably still figure it out, or other people will leak it, but it won't be "official", so hopefully will keep the damage down)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 13:32 UTC

Well said. 11. A dude snorting Ket of your body IS ALSO RAPE

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 14:45 UTC

Be sure to feed your 10 cats today.

@janedoe12026-10-19 12:54 UTC

I was a sex doll for all intents and purposes, which is sad but, unfortunately, something I'm not used to, or something that I haven't experienced before.

~Lucy Craig

The wording of this statement is, well.... interesting.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 12:56 UTC

Imagine being raped and wondering why they don't care about your scars.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 13:26 UTC

lol they know, once a girl starts talking self-harm/eating disorders/being Bi but only fucking guys, it kills the mood...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-20 07:30 UTC

They like the Bi Shit, Gotta be at least bi-curious to engage in that 3 some and watch. Male 1 allegedly even wanted a 4 some doing anal ; he'd have to feel another dick bumping his for her to get plugged vaginally and anally.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-20 07:37 UTC

Fair point! If one of the boys in the corner had put a thumb in Jonathan or Matt, this could have turned in to a proper orgy

Anonymous2026-10-19 11:19 UTC

Serious question! Attention everyone. Thumbs up for yes, train for no.

Knowing what you know now, would you let her snort ket off your dick?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 18:10 UTC

Two thumbs up and reached a full train! There you have it folks, pretty conclusive! Jane Doe's cock sniffing days are probably behind her, smacking her ass. We consulted with experts who say her best bet now is to work the glory hole scene

Anonymous2026-10-19 10:27 UTC

This is part of the decision by Cornell - Redacted AF, but still has her admitting left right and centre that she was consenting. The real problem is that people were invited and saw her naked - which Cornell calls sexual exploitation.

https://www.cbsnews.com/projects/2026/cornell-rape-allegations-documents/docs/EF2026_0292_John_Doe_v_Cornell_University_OTHER_COURT_FILED_D_44.pdf

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 12:08 UTC

https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/nyscef/DocumentList?docketId=8AD/r5jq1gy2KZscUteAhg==

@janedoe1

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 11:45 UTC

Adding here for the library.

Title IX Findings (Redacted)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 10:32 UTC

I'm genuinely shocked that nudes of Lucy Craig haven't leaked yet....

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 11:30 UTC

Get your own generative AI, you cheapskate... ngl, you're also a bit creepy

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-19 12:00 UTC

I don't think OP meant nudify nudes. OP was replying to a post that said dozens saw Lucy nekkid. We really believe no one snapped a souvenir?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-19 12:35 UTC

Must be plenty! Imagine if you got a pic of her when she started flexing naked? But if they trace that shit to you, you would be crucified, so if any pictures survived, they are in the top secret spank bank

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous2026-10-19 12:43 UTC

Am I evil for wondering why she tried to flex at all to intimidate them or whatever she said? I had second hand embarrassment reading that...

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 6

Anonymous2026-10-19 13:27 UTC

lol I'm surprised she didn't bark or hiss as well

@janedoe12026-10-19 01:26 UTC

Good night all.

UPDATE:

Petitions: These pages got a nice visual update.

NEW FEATURE

Press archive: In this section we (the admins) will be adding legacy media article URLs manually as they are published (bare with us) to a internal database. Once added, Lucy Server will feed it automatically to the WayBack Machine and then check for changes every 24hrs. All previous versions, updated archives, etc will become available and searchable and citable. It already works, just not the prettiest yet. We have added about 150 topic related pages already and it is running smoothly.

EXPERT CONTRIBUTORS

We have anonymously reached out to various professionals on related topics, to ask them if they would like to contribute -no credit, no glory. Purely to be adding to the marketplace of knowledge, anonymously as we are all doing here. We have received and now published two new articles from external contributors: Moonies and Title IX.

Let us know what topics, subjects you would like to have explained in detail and we will try to find an expert to break it down for us.

TRANSPARENCY: No comments were hidden today.

As always, if there is a new feature or update idea, let us know. We will do our best to incorporate your suggestions -most of the new features were the suggestions of commenters.

In the meantime, remember, the answer to speech that you do not like is not censorship, it is more speech. Keep speaking, keep being refined or vulgar, educational or brain dead, just keep speaking. We designed this for you to speak as freely as you desire. No logs, no identity verifications, no emails, phone numbers, text message codes required, no credit cards, no advertisement, no donation links, no self promotions, no tracking pixels.

Just pure speech, pure discourse.

Have a good night all.

Lucy_Craig_meme_video.mp4

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 10:30 UTC

Great! I'd be curious about how many details the Lamestream Media try to "memory hole" as this story continues -- the function you describe would catch that.

I'd also be curious about which search engines are the most reliable in this case. Obviously, engines tied to Facebook/TikTok/Insta are all Orwellian, censoring "Lucy Craig." (I personally found Yandex to be pretty good.)

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 11:05 UTC

I used Freespoke to find this page

@janedoe12026-10-18 23:57 UTC edited

New Haven high school students Walk Out: "Justice for Jane Doe [Lucy Craig] & All Survivors".

Yale socialist club organized a high school student walk out from 5 neighboring high school campuses in support of Lucy Craig on Friday.

The socialist put out a statement:

To eliminate the influence of wealthy donors and their families, we call to abolish ICE and tax the rich to fund free public college, and for universities to be run democratically by students, workers, and community members. If school communities controlled universities, we could fight to bring real justice for survivors, to make college free, to pay workers fairly, and to invest in high-quality public schools. We need to build a socialist feminist movement that ultimately takes aim at capitalism to bring justice for Jane Doe and end all sexual violence.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 13:18 UTC

I feel sorry for that little cunt with the bill board

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-20 07:24 UTC

thats probably u with ur cunt

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-20 11:02 UTC

Wait, is he a cunt, or does he have a cunt? Transgender? How do you know? Did you fondle him?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-20 11:28 UTC

I don't have to tell you!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 18:51 UTC

Thought bubble: "I worked on this all morning, and everyone else is on their phones! Suzie hasn't even read it... she will see how sensitive I am! Why won't she just love me? Fucking bitch! Maybe I should do a Donald and grab her by the pussy?"

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 12:50 UTC

"All survivors" Matthew Ingalls was described in her testimony as passing out. He was uncomfortable with the situation but Jane assured him it was fine. He alleged at points she did anal and oral on him while he was passed out. He said he was too intoxicated to consent. Based on her testimony I don't think she was ever as out of it as Ingalls.

All these "good morally superior" people who care so much about SA victims usually paint him as an evil rapist who deserves to be mutilated, raped, thrown in prison, you name it based on an accusation that has not yet been proven. An accusation he made against Jane as well.

These are not good people, they are fucking evil.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 00:48 UTC

From gang bang straight to communism.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-20 07:26 UTC

the gang bang is communism

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 04:22 UTC

Communal pussy upstairs

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 03:52 UTC

And if you are worried about global warming, friction from rape has been shown to generate heat! Support Lucy by donating to savetheglaciers.,com

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 00:08 UTC

Anything for a day off lol

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 05:19 UTC

From snowdays to hoedays

@janedoe12026-10-18 21:04 UTC

NEW PETITION: END THE MEDIA GATEKEEPING - RELEASE THE EVIDENCE IN THE LUCY CRAIG / JANE DOE CASE | Demand transparency, impartial reporting, and the publication of source materials by legacy news organizations.

https://lucycraig.blog/petition/end-the-media-gatekeeping-release-the-evidence-in-the-lucy-craig-jane-doe-case#sign-petition

Anonymous2026-10-18 20:14 UTC

Has anyone done Ketamine? If so, what was your experience?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 09:34 UTC

one thumbs up and 3 trains? Sounds about right!

@janedoe12026-10-18 16:18 UTC

We are now actively archiving mainstream media and providing source material to the archives so that if something changes on the article, it will be preserved and to provide as complete information as possible for the examination of the topic and the resulting public debate. https://lucycraig.blog/wayback (bare with us as we try to create the best user experience for this new feature).

Anonymous2026-10-18 14:26 UTC

Now they are implying Cornell police are corrupt and protected the boys. I guess they are trying to deny the police report.

https://www.timesunion.com/state/article/fraternity-official-claimed-called-favors-22464094.php

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-19 08:13 UTC

What hasn't been asked, regarding authority figures, is what fucking business of Cornell was any of this really? Expand that for anything else really. For an educational institute, make sure your qualifiations are up to date, the courses are dispensed well and other shit like this.

The whole thing stinks like some form of government over reach (around). You almost know that if it was a case of two males getting into a fist fight on the grounds outside of the Cornell, then Cornell would not care.

Maybe someone who understands the laws better can confirm this or not, but the point of this comment is that it seems the Cornell 7 have a great case for a lawsuit against Cornell.

It just looks like complete shit and overreach (around) by yet another government institute (always follow money, certification and so on). It's not just for cases like this, but all kinds of things you might class as personal. Who the fuck is Cornell to pass some sort of judgement on them?

Break up with your gf/bf and then the College/University can pass some sort of judgement? Meanwhile, fuck this penis envying, 'female hyena', power playing whore. Her and the rest of her kind. As full of shit as their men are.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 10:47 UTC

Agree. Universities should just be a business of research and education, not babysitting and policing.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 15:26 UTC

Yet they took her slutty statement, and investigated her slutty story, and filed her slutty charges. I wish the police force everywhere was that corrupt!

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 14:33 UTC

Just like how this skank refuses to even read the police report: https://lucycraig.blog/_wijdr/comment/3923

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 14:29 UTC

Dumb sluts are using the Spaghetti Strategy at this point. This case jumped the shark a week ago, when skank Lucy Craig's "our bodies our choice asf" texts hit.

Anonymous2026-10-18 10:29 UTC

Lucy Craig upskirt! This is not AI, guys!

@janedoe12026-10-18 01:29 UTC

Good night everyone.

SITE UPDATES:

Only the Library page was updated today, which got a citation to the location on the site. This way you can see where the media / library content has been used. Sorry, our engineer that writes the code was exhausted and had real life to handle. S/he is working on a new feature, discussed below, that will be ready by Monday.

TRANSPARENCY REPORT:

No comments have been hidden today. This week, in total, only 5 real person comments have been hidden -we have no way to ban anyone from commenting and so the 3 individuals who made those comments are still participating (we assume) in the conversation. Fake comments like the Indian spam bots that want to help with SEO and bullshit like that are automatically hidden when we see them.

REMINDER:

If you have not seen the "evidence" cites by a media outlet because they refuse to publish (such as a police report, or the Title IX investigation material...) question the source vigorously. Assume the article narrative is a lie, and do not give credit to the publication or accept their narrative and explanation of the material. Until you see it with your own eyes. Here at WIJDR we will always publish every document, media file, instantly, and anything we cite is published without any redactions added by us. Bring us your material.

BY THE NUMBERS

Your participation here is thousands of times greater than the paywall articles by mainstream media. Just looking at the comment section on many of the mainstream media pages, we are substantially more involved, more active, more engaged in the conversation, more educated on the topic, and have significantly more visitors and readers. It is a testament to the way the public feels towards mainstream media.

FUTURE UPDATE: Using the WayBack machine and archive.today, we are working on a way to mirror every mainstream media article about this case, for preservation (msm have published, deleted and republished altered material, often without notice.

We intend to mirror every article we can find, without a paywall, and provide it for free.

The idea is that every news article about "Jane Doe" (Lucy Craig) will be pumped into a dashboard here which will automatically archive the article on the archive sites, remove the paywall, and then our site will dynamically populate the content when someone searches the Press archive -like we do already with the docket. If the article changes, it will note the changes inside the original version and show all variations. We will then feed the article content into our larger database of search so that it will become a permenent part of the Lucy Craig record cite records.

An example of how MSM alters their records is attached, MSN (i believe it was) published screenshots of the Cornell Police Report. They regretted it and deleted it and published updated redactions. Notice anything interesting? LHC.

As always, we appreciate your unregulated, uncensored, unmoderated, unfiltered conversations.

Good night and keep the discussion going.

Anonymous2026-10-17 20:46 UTC

Gay.

Welp folks, these are the future attorneys who will shape the definition of due process in America.

Good luck.

xTfl4KtGXf1V_M--.mp4

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 19:18 UTC

Nuh lawyers are never trained to honestly judge the situation… their job is to make biased arguments

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 08:22 UTC

Depends on where they passed the Bar exam. For example China!

She didn't even last 5 days!

Lifted this comment from elsewhere but it will make you vomit a little. Stormy Daniels looks a lot like his mom

in passing. Natalie Harp (whatever her name is) looks like Ivanka. Katie Zacharia is supposed to look a lot

like his grand daughter. Feel free to search images and see for yourself.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-19 09:31 UTC

I can believe it! He said he would fuck Ivanka already. If he could, he'd clone himself and make a train. I'd rather see Lucy Craig win 5 million dollars than see Trump survive the midterms.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 04:20 UTC

“Show what real justice looks like….”

As they mimic beating death the 7 accused frat boys.

Lol.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-18 20:40 UTC

Jesus, at an ivy league school? I thought that one chick was going to turn on of those effigies in to a dildo and rape it. She would that splinters for lucy

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-18 06:23 UTC

If you want to support her, you should bring a pillow and dry hump it

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 00:00 UTC

I love how they always look and act exactly how you expect them to.

@janedoe12026-10-17 19:48 UTC

All these so called "mainstream media" outlets, Washington Post, New York Times, The New Yorker, ... all exploding with deeply important, holier than thou, exclusive new details, famous talking heads, headlines, then putting every "Jane Doe" article behind a paywall and not sharing any documents, evidence, content, material, or names so that the reader must first pay and then accept (what they paid for) their version and interpretation of the material, really pisses me off.

"The New York Times has reviewed a police report given to the Cornell Police"... "Washington Post has reviewed the Title IX investigation documents...." yet not one of these fucking sources provides the documents for the public to make up their own minds and inturpretation of the documents. These outlets create 2 or 3 versions of the same article, test them each for social media paid advertisement, tease an hour or two of non-paywall, then when they have the statistics for which is performing best, they put the article behind a paywall and pay to promote the best performing version.

This is why we designed WIJDR to be fully transparent, preserve and make available every document, meme, audio, video, content we can find or scrape or that is added via the comments. We are not going to gatekeep information while 1) demanding that you take our word for it, and 2) charge you to even read the text of an article or topic...

The mainstream media are a bunch of bitches.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 13:11 UTC

WaPo just butthurt that they can't gatekeep information no more, it kills their ability to frame the narrative...

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 20:54 UTC

They will publish what makes them the most profit.

@janedoe12026-10-17 19:26 UTC

I will point out only one thing about how stupid these protesters are.

There is absolutely no chance that before this would Lucy Craig have shown up to any protests.

"I know that if there was a protest for me, Jane Doe would show up." No, she would not. She doesn't care about you in the least. She did not show up for any protests in her life. Her only concern was and is for her own self, reputation, and clout.

The rest of this clip is just "blah, blah, blah" to me. I just point out this one segment near the end.

Jane_Doe_Protest.mp4

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 21:40 UTC

Nose ring theory.

↳ Reply to @janedoe1 · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:35 UTC

Someone should print this and ask every single protestor to read it. I’m concerned that almost none of them read.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:36 UTC

her police report

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:23 UTC

Let's say she did consent to a few of those men. Did she ever consent to them posting "free pussy" in the group chat?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 00:01 UTC

Do you agree with her testimony, that she still said no and they listened? She said yes to other stuff.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 20:08 UTC

1st Amendment.

While disgusting, it’s still protected.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:59 UTC

Does a post make it rape?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:32 UTC

If you agree that she is enjoying the gang bang, then there is nothing wrong with telling friends about the free pussy.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 19:41 UTC

That's not how consent works.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-18 03:54 UTC

Telling people there is free pussy, and the slutshaming are separate, they did not influence her thinking when she said yes. Otherwise you could say it was not consensual because one of the boys was circumcised and she assumed he would not be

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:14 UTC

Hi, I just want to say I personally know "Jane Doe". I was in a few classes with her and I can confirm her name is NOT Lucy Craig. Lucy is just another student at the school and is not affiliated with this case. Spreading misinformation about a person is extremely harmful, especially when everything is alleged. You don't have to agree with this message, but I just want to make you guys aware that this is not the person you are looking for.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-18 04:13 UTC

The jedi mind trick?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-18 13:17 UTC

"Lucy Craig is not the slut you're looking for..."

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 22:01 UTC

Oh? So who is the "real" jane doe?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 21:45 UTC

The NYT confirmed it today, lying skank

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 22:52 UTC

"I AINT NO SKANK!!"

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

@janedoe12026-10-17 19:36 UTC

Let me guess, a fem-nazi trying to divert attention? If I were to guess you are probably a student at a university somewhere, but not Cornell. Maybe somewhere like Virginia Polytechnic Institute or some other non-Ivy League university or academic learning center. You probably never attended any classes with "Jane Doe" or for that matter any classes at Cornell University.

Given that you are using this site, I would say that you are a first- or second-year student -because the courses are easier and it is a Saturday so you have no studying to do. Maybe your school had a few student protests, or you saw online somewhere that you can try to manipulate and sow doubt with comments like this since the whole "I am Jane Doe" nonsense did not work.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 18:02 UTC

Is that so? Then why did Lucy Craig's parents home in Birmingham, AL get swatted and the attorney confirmed it was "Jane Doe".

Check the police scanner for the date and time of the swatting in Birmingham.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 18:09 UTC

The person in the pictures are not her.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-17 18:35 UTC

This is not true either. The images are taken from her still available IG account, which places her at her parents home in Birmingham, and at Cornell.

What a coincidence that her name happens to be Lucile H. Craig, from Birmingham, AL, attending Cornell University until something "dramatic" happened that she no longer posts about Cornell after only a short period of time attending the school -and bragging about it signficantly. And what a coincidence that her family home in Birmingham is connected to her father's medical services company which also connects to her, was swatted, as confirmed by her own attorney, the same time and date.

If there are two Lucile H. Craigs with identical life stories as told through her Instagram account, identical home town, selective enrollment university, and absence therefrom, and post attendance, post lawsuit police incidents all connecting, then we really live in the matrix.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:28 UTC

I hope you guys grow and mature one day, and improve your emotional intelligence, because from what I've seen, you guys are speaking very immaturely about a serious topic. We don't have to agree, but please speak with logic and maturity. You won't be achieving anything with these immature words and actions.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 23:06 UTC

Power of forum anonymity.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:33 UTC

Where is the logic? I’ve never seen a good argument why this is not consensual AND Lucy is not an offender.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 3

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:40 UTC

that's not up for you to decide, isn't it? you're not the victim. But if you want to argue against it, then by all means.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-17 21:47 UTC

Tell that to the cunts who doxxed the accused. Lying whore Lucy Craig is fair game.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous2026-10-17 22:57 UTC

They're all whores.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

@janedoe12026-10-17 20:02 UTC

"that's not up for you to decide"

Actually it is. It was placed on us, as a society, to judge Lucy by her own attorneys' actions. Her attorneys wanted wanted us to judge her as a victim, to take their word for it, and to protest and demand that the "culture" at Cornell be given an enigma that is only favorable to his consignment fee.

However, if we take the position that is fundamentally wrong, that we must judge, having been invited to do exactly that by her attorneys' 5,000 million media appearances, then all of sudden we are not supposed to "judge". The attorneys want the population to be sheep and just accept their version without any questioning. We are okay to judge her favorably as a victim, but we are not okay to mention her name if we do not accept her narrative.

Sorry, but I will indeed judge her as a whore, based on the same evidence that she wants us to disregard and just take her lolwyer's word that she is a "victim".

The first amendment would be useless if we did not judge her, either favorably or disfavorably to her position, because we have been invited by her representation to do exactly that, and when we did, and when we saw the discrepancies and omissions and implausiblility of her narrative all of a sudden we have become "begots" in the eyes of her attorney.

An attorney who has just labelled half the country as "bigots" merely because they do not buy his famefag narrative cannot be trusted with anything else because he has shown that he cannot be trusted with the vital and most meaningful aspects of stewardship of the first amendment. He has shown that he only cares about the first amendment if it is favorable to his client and his media narrative and his case, but if you challenge that, well you are automatically a bigot.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 4

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:59 UTC

Why don’t you tell this to those protesters and misandrists? They are much bigger no?

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 5

Anonymous2026-10-17 18:01 UTC

I never said it only applied to specific groups.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:20 UTC

Hi Lucy

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 1

Anonymous2026-10-17 17:16 UTC

^ just to clarify. their names are very similar so please don't harass the wrong person here.

↳ Reply to Anonymous · Level 2

Anonymous2026-10-19 11:27 UTC

What's your name? If you want, 7 or 9 of us could come by and interview you?

@janedoe12026-10-17 16:59 UTC

NEW FEATURE ON OUR BLOG:

Every content / media item in our library now sources to the locations where it appears on our blog for easy verification, purpose, and explanation of it's use. If it is used in multiple locations on this blog, it will cite to every location: comment, article, docket, replies, discussion, etc. with a link to the source.

This addition was a suggestion by one of our commenters who had difficulty understanding a purpose of a meme / photo that was in the library originated and wanted to know it's source from within our blog.

We read every suggestion and try to code it into our blog.

Anonymous2026-10-17 16:59 UTC

17 Life Lessons I Learned By Participating In Orgies

No 15. Be discreet, and never name names when you talk about what happened.

Now the boys learned the lesson in a hard way. Should have read this article first.

https://www.buzzfeed.com/lucasfauno/orgy-life-lessons

Who IsJane DoeReally?

Controversial cases still require evidence, process, and room for dissent.

Reporting that helped frame the public questions

Articles & analysis

WHEN A JUDGE CITES A LAW THAT MAY NOT APPLY

MAGGIE GANDY: WHO IS THE LAWYER REPORTEDLY BEING CONSIDERED FOR LETITIA JAMES'S CORNELL INVESTIGATION?

A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR NEEDS A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR?

Whitney Seals Wants Cornell to “Right a Wrong.”

TO JUSTICE PHAEDRA PERRY-BOND

The Prosecutor Spoke First

Documents should be inspectable, searchable, and quotable in context.

New docket entries · last 24 hours

Topics controlled by the administrators; comments controlled by their authors.

Latest comments

Comments & replies

Who Is
Jane Doe
Really?